Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030359AbWARPoh (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2006 10:44:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030356AbWARPog (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2006 10:44:36 -0500 Received: from sj-iport-3-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.72]:61351 "EHLO sj-iport-3.cisco.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030351AbWARPof (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2006 10:44:35 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: i="3.99,381,1131350400"; d="scan'208"; a="393171253:sNHT35477368" To: "Sean Hefty" Cc: , , openib-general@openib.org Subject: Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 5/5] [RFC] Infiniband: connection abstraction X-Message-Flag: Warning: May contain useful information References: From: Roland Dreier Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 07:44:33 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Sean Hefty's message of "Tue, 17 Jan 2006 15:44:48 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.17 (Jumbo Shrimp, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Jan 2006 15:44:33.0423 (UTC) FILETIME=[13ED11F0:01C61C46] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 400 Lines: 11 > + UCMA_MAX_BACKLOG = 128 Is there any reason that we might want to make this a tunable? Maybe as a module parameter that's writable in sysfs... - R. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/