Received: by 2002:a25:7ec1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z184csp6120660ybc; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 15:28:27 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwi5wkCa25Lm0AOC7Fq+Gxj+dYytPAQh+PVjWzcwUWdrSFtdMamyFbH+RR1pqU8VUyBs7mO X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:a2d0:: with SMTP id by16mr3473876ejb.322.1574897307550; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 15:28:27 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1574897307; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=UDzZX9ihUkLhTvPAjgCFib8cizzCjSGFdPjU41Jl/JpNnjiAYC9AQL4CszAWszLROH cutfSZcbGrKrS7kBG7zyhHcdCReZP8W0FjtmyLJBmmeWnZPiXfxOQSy4cadhJI5wvcVN cTU9cxdcJO5nrZ1EgoVVf4fxSGQIqmbldV/QVaFN/Difji4JE04eSaNn29FBmKF9rAuI /zYPr+er/ULbXyAxBijztOEsxh52rd8XroErXhoHlM+MQ2m7EbRstPN2F6w301O2AuN2 H0OZHWlz8Zu8FcAotw8OpsnC/RVRaZ/P/m9tX1Z4XU2RTygIBGEugjSIX8xTjsa5v1jL ESww== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=4kdO83yXVKHlae/aWQdPCSmhNAw41fqvucORgkGWgTU=; b=B06JpWNufm5Sj/M686wQpSZnAX0kzcPzbu9HhktuB7PliodxOTNfGEWo1l9eB/9sQW +qFrBwx0Zdah3mW6PVyypiWCGfmvVSm56cl0zIwKQdKT5GiQ01H1OLF1EAkSCJDGkUus TjDxPfZTGTaTqnhS4FscF6rPUpNjLE64BssnJUUiQDCIV2/GJP4gVgDEo4vHPet5lDwi to0O7ruJeDQBrrOPZRX8ddLzofm6was17N9+4Qd4xznfIkZEw+dpuvZOdR6Xiqpj+ygZ i3rlIqu6oA6/w6l85v5SQiB1rMoX1ljUC95H12ckKl7Q2pFW/yu8zsp4+7BVyJ4WytN4 CGVQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f47si11769580edb.152.2019.11.27.15.28.03; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 15:28:27 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727187AbfK0X06 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 27 Nov 2019 18:26:58 -0500 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:47426 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727031AbfK0X06 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Nov 2019 18:26:58 -0500 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Nov 2019 15:26:58 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,251,1571727600"; d="scan'208";a="211837656" Received: from tassilo.jf.intel.com (HELO tassilo.localdomain) ([10.7.201.21]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Nov 2019 15:26:57 -0800 Received: by tassilo.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 889E1300FE1; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 15:26:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 15:26:57 -0800 From: Andi Kleen To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Andi Kleen , jolsa@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Optimize perf stat for large number of events/cpus Message-ID: <20191127232657.GL84886@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: <20191121001522.180827-1-andi@firstfloor.org> <20191127151657.GE22719@kernel.org> <20191127154305.GJ22719@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191127154305.GJ22719@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 12:43:05PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > So, have you tried running 'perf test' after each cset is applied and > built? I ran it at the end, but there are quite a few fails out of the box, so I missed that one thanks. This patch fixes it. Let me know if I should submit it in a more formal way. --- Fix event times test case Reported-by: Arnaldo Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen diff --git a/tools/perf/lib/evsel.c b/tools/perf/lib/evsel.c index 4c6485fc31b9..4dc06289f4c7 100644 --- a/tools/perf/lib/evsel.c +++ b/tools/perf/lib/evsel.c @@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ int perf_evsel__enable(struct perf_evsel *evsel) int i; int err = 0; - for (i = 0; i < evsel->cpus->nr && !err; i++) + for (i = 0; i < xyarray__max_x(evsel->fd) && !err; i++) err = perf_evsel__run_ioctl(evsel, PERF_EVENT_IOC_ENABLE, NULL, i); return err; } @@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ int perf_evsel__disable(struct perf_evsel *evsel) int i; int err = 0; - for (i = 0; i < evsel->cpus->nr && !err; i++) + for (i = 0; i < xyarray__max_x(evsel->fd) && !err; i++) err = perf_evsel__run_ioctl(evsel, PERF_EVENT_IOC_DISABLE, NULL, i); return err; } diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c index 59b9b4f3fe34..0844e3e29fb0 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c @@ -1853,6 +1853,10 @@ int perf_evsel__open_per_cpu(struct evsel *evsel, struct perf_cpu_map *cpus, int cpu) { + if (cpu == -1) + return evsel__open_cpu(evsel, cpus, NULL, 0, + cpus ? cpus->nr : 1); + return evsel__open_cpu(evsel, cpus, NULL, cpu, cpu + 1); }