Received: by 2002:a25:7ec1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z184csp6545247ybc; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 01:04:35 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx18yq86J97TkRtLJ7+94Di9iPblFubgxzGVFh86Foe7HATHPbXsUN9Ir8+KMxB6zWjK36A X-Received: by 2002:a50:a7c5:: with SMTP id i63mr36593956edc.79.1574931875726; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 01:04:35 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1574931875; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=frNePeo1AJTvLE6Y5iR2WFEysoRi0ThSrrkNm0u5rHRINlJaAj03bYNJTplZ9LT1EF 9D0HC2UTcz+T+HCYDIRo4f2pRRYBXU+bpQ9MWu+9hsGOwQYEZgEcULCV1lOpc4/vbvvf XNdek1d3vA8VLQN6KxMGVPm4cKHJAsjTcNSVzl1CUYLKyCp56BSYAHXeQ1n94XmzOEpF /hVZy7Y52CqihTWigSmAPX/XAyMffZxM6Np0c240yy1XzP7hD/yyaF/ayb5+QcRSK5Fg hmsmOvW2nCKPux0zDCQsc9keywTfPUV5QyLXyyYw2ljyDwXzpxVsUozWAOfxk8c85wi4 GVGw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=HoqmZ4ISGst+6RxBOTmccwmK74t4nIgQ0Amev8cPgJw=; b=TznjFexuT1EZt/J+1PnQ4TRmmeHUG0phQHyu6/NNRP2x4xijMcnS1djKTxAW+4M6+F ndB5P55vAtGpc8lJd6+zyLGk+V/yXOllbKLwIgbHtjlooZnAp2e7SznroMUbMumtKUEX keq3+971kq8FKTAtvoZoHR7fdJuB1oVruWPkUNdOyCXcp8UaS7mgWP8Xa2PHG8rrTxwj v1Y0QEYD2zR+A3QV0UUNPfRUKvnicsCQ+C/4jgt+lmP8niZGR8wyif5/n55Xf2/q7mkx gj8Se8WQOowfbExIZn9Xdsm6YaCJtyYXanTs6ZcL0uwKm+HexCpxkj+tARrouOYUBgCF yYoA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=cM7lGvan; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u2si11123218ejo.137.2019.11.28.01.04.11; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 01:04:35 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=cM7lGvan; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727313AbfK1Iyb (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 28 Nov 2019 03:54:31 -0500 Received: from mail-qv1-f67.google.com ([209.85.219.67]:38986 "EHLO mail-qv1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726594AbfK1Iy3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Nov 2019 03:54:29 -0500 Received: by mail-qv1-f67.google.com with SMTP id v16so10031486qvq.6 for ; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 00:54:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HoqmZ4ISGst+6RxBOTmccwmK74t4nIgQ0Amev8cPgJw=; b=cM7lGvanWO5KiySXbzZYYcyrA6cgoAnT7nFXRAyOZh1whtmTQn7+SREmxD8m2HFExg ZJTsDpaLLOX0RWst+X5UrTSn4MSOol0pqlgKEs2hfycLAGBl2V75cW8BAcy03nr+9UHu O3VSnrploTWsSndKiNJWN98XCGaKsd+dogwMqEY5xD9H5+YCUC/c0DYmEL+iL6KuKyEE xwdLNQ4G1Y+ixl27uFSGtaEsfRk08Jprnp6Jk507XQ2+l0SL3FqgwaSTJ7xWF7eSYDtu 89u/jkRigRPi66mttLx1EgLjn3M2n7B+AasFgU4AFuolX7BzG6nFUEWR45Id8SavuzfE jRLg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HoqmZ4ISGst+6RxBOTmccwmK74t4nIgQ0Amev8cPgJw=; b=dsqgjZDtVEaxEUEju2wOd6OB9+FKGG5KsB2jNeYfKqXmqCQ3kv7anm/2/6stigcSID DYDiAtxs63l7f6broF7x+Wljfys65u7WmppjQMnkfDxVPlqo65EO8im9ntg5rIkRMblZ OM0g7Jg+QywQ7YwSxVEBJzMQD4lwbd1WD+GH2arfvgvr3wAp2/O7LQPH1PYLyweIJD6V nVMYfIuLNJnm1PLHEPGDQy075zASY7hIf16epf2VDBLSt9kB+2/7n0Aqudbg3yallzWG 0xb5VMygKGQ2ZooYM+1JX+YFLk9a8wJ/wPpoFqFLLObWJiBqk11ckovtEcTJ/zyLy17P TzQQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVn3pIJM9/WztGW5yi2ujzXw/zJm6kQzMW2RSpMnOY38KzsKWtG xvQKPudsAtC5jgbTVHeHD5EPqhgxKd5oL4LNcfaXlA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:8ee:: with SMTP id dr14mr9867650qvb.122.1574931266487; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 00:54:26 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <0000000000009aa32205985e78b6@google.com> <2825703.dkhYCMB3mh@sven-edge> <1809369.KjlzdqruN6@sven-edge> In-Reply-To: <1809369.KjlzdqruN6@sven-edge> From: Dmitry Vyukov Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 09:54:15 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: WARNING in mark_lock (3) To: Sven Eckelmann Cc: syzkaller , syzbot , a@unstable.cc, b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org, David Miller , Jakub Kicinski , Jamal Hadi Salim , =?UTF-8?B?SmnFmcOtIFDDrXJrbw==?= , LKML , mareklindner@neomailbox.ch, netdev , sw@simonwunderlich.de, syzkaller-bugs , vinicius.gomes@intel.com, wang.yi59@zte.com.cn, Cong Wang Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 9:46 AM Sven Eckelmann wrote: > > On Thursday, 28 November 2019 09:40:32 CET Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 8:25 AM Sven Eckelmann wrote: > > > > > > On Thursday, 28 November 2019 03:00:01 CET syzbot wrote: > > > [...] > > > > bisection log: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/bisect.txt?x=132ee536e00000 > > > > start commit: 89d57ddd Merge tag 'media/v5.5-1' of git://git.kernel.org/.. > > > > git tree: upstream > > > > final crash: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/report.txt?x=10aee536e00000 > > > > > > Can the syzbot infrastructure be told to ignore this crash in the bisect run? > > > Because this should be an unrelated crash which is (hopefully) fixed in > > > 40e220b4218b ("batman-adv: Avoid free/alloc race when handling OGM buffer"). > > > > +syzkaller mailing list for syzbot discussion > > > > Hi Sven, > > > > There is no such functionality at the moment. > > What exactly do you mean? Somehow telling it interactively? Or > > hardcode some set of crashes for linux? I don't see how any of these > > options can really work... > > I was thinking more about rerunning the same bisect but tell it to assume > "crashed: general protection fault in batadv_iv_ogm_queue_add" as OK instead > of assuming that it is a crashed like the previous "crashed: WARNING in > mark_lock". Just to get a non-bogus bisect result. Or try to rerun the > bisect between 40e220b4218b and 89d57dddd7d319ded00415790a0bb3c954b7e386 But... but this done by a program. What do you mean by "tell it"?