Received: by 2002:a25:7ec1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z184csp6582458ybc; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 01:50:03 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxeUX0zna8w4IBXNxrSsKNf+GnGcox5/xRgYmjEkS1i6JCIWCUJBWV1uI898G36jLZa/ka9 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5251:: with SMTP id y17mr55350241ejm.108.1574934603640; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 01:50:03 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1574934603; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=VOVrbFsvLxE7Xd6veKYhyF4bzeVqNssHhlpyzhh+WrVjhuLEEtA/eujlHJdFQdH9vN ZMW9D4gjeO0yLpDEgLd0gYN00t3etw6IRez0kGX3V9qj0kYI+/kSA2yylqcvSA9RIrE7 alToJvCbiyK4fS6iU60n1sWPXGOdzcyGBzrrestdWRkiJUIv2z12idn8mmXsiHAapwk1 OMbNKgx0crqejIQuaPyvgNOGRwVXEPaak9uiZJA6QPhyNFIK54bP9rXQBtzNz/51n+wH JE8MrjX7gDdlgfWlHgMb3ydrhy34yqIAh7vTfqLvRMAYHeuJh4Rpn49TuqUVAAGwCKyM 9Hsg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject :message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :dkim-signature; bh=n8nBDGoN0K3s86w3qAOLIFa+QTL71HaL6QaGvULODQY=; b=npipg9kZdEZ+CaZp36GIcltBIOJQkzut2h8Z0LViqynJhdJEweaCvTnQulDnCcTPhq VYfeVlbpZXe4LFrhqaTwEGxGypL5HNU5LYZI8Hz60DCOQGRPmsEwOcttVIf31S4Mqk78 d0JbpC+JdyXzQqdq8IkFxaObZn9crVUvoKI1zcHsCKXxgTCFoG3vta3cjUv1lS/DJK+Y 8R8psAXzmpCJH3ArZc4gB2eKzBLKiL2WeVJkqn3o7TY47BtyOh1bFXtuYKUS7DUoWoud E9cZy5DNxBbcwiwlRcKpbcj5RBhAfhUJmBA/uW8NKMWSludqttj9Khy7f0xKuMQyH3SU K4gA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@bgdev-pl.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=gGUWEfrw; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o28si13285774edc.353.2019.11.28.01.49.39; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 01:50:03 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@bgdev-pl.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=gGUWEfrw; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726556AbfK1JqA (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 28 Nov 2019 04:46:00 -0500 Received: from mail-il1-f193.google.com ([209.85.166.193]:37894 "EHLO mail-il1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726133AbfK1JqA (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Nov 2019 04:46:00 -0500 Received: by mail-il1-f193.google.com with SMTP id u17so23699591ilq.5 for ; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 01:45:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bgdev-pl.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=n8nBDGoN0K3s86w3qAOLIFa+QTL71HaL6QaGvULODQY=; b=gGUWEfrwZ8fyY0iWUXoMHbWxMwh4vmo6k2uBz1f3eyHX8GOG8rlcbqqXqBHNWRhCoZ Be/MJJWw6Z3ZC8tQEGi1qg3CgflCspNUnFp7qFv0rcUgE7+R9TQmv5tbYbO1RVZA6c7u c6o+lIDopnu9EYmPmztVkMvjeTRxg4JJKpH+WRhVAY3osXVk+0lrs86L4/NVWreFrFow ATTC8xOJCHMfg/OGTUfiAFCckOCoq+ltup4GX3sDqIe7xV5CiuNKmOJYVZcE5vuDt9F5 OmL5h8xBiJgBcly8v9D078Q7t4zpvA2kND8KEheYWj1pn+KBcUPuRxF6N2exxzF3D9UT MQWg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=n8nBDGoN0K3s86w3qAOLIFa+QTL71HaL6QaGvULODQY=; b=S1LWxtSJYYjU9e/rHSd7LYuHJVsNOfhDnAoIYSQtiKj0eSIIARxZMz0X3j6a5lXzBD x94hN7OqIZw3MAUNgcdcplKqlFfhnikS6UO4lf/lXSAM/QvGXP3HUDiwKVlHRSSftR2z FmGDe6tPHx4z3XRq9iTEMoHj6ZUhC0U1yZCmX++aSsA2OAHjdZ0WyGKFyxhJUjkmkJaH nJ8D3GgYeCF6kmySrbU9vib2cHnSDtyPHt/Oivla5/Gz33YPreiC6b5J6y0ozZnrafsF X/A6mm3PP6O986CUHDWK6tXVCsBY7xfl94yCHu5pPkGqGnJMEqcn5Oz8+9iV48hSCH4C wSCg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXVE8PtG3mlrUEMODqivNG16wP/7uivmIX9np5v7MlY7MgpacNo GBLFa04OzoPmV+X80wZWnMgDnyz6loFoaSGn99dYFg== X-Received: by 2002:a92:96c2:: with SMTP id g185mr11796534ilh.40.1574934357636; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 01:45:57 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191127133510.10614-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> <20191127133510.10614-8-brgl@bgdev.pl> <20191127152410.GA24936@sol> <20191127232330.GA3761@sol> In-Reply-To: <20191127232330.GA3761@sol> From: Bartosz Golaszewski Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 10:45:46 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] gpiolib: add new ioctl() for monitoring changes in line info To: Kent Gibson Cc: Linus Walleij , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Bartosz Golaszewski Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org czw., 28 lis 2019 o 00:23 Kent Gibson napisa=C5=82(a= ): > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 04:50:43PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > =C5=9Br., 27 lis 2019 o 16:24 Kent Gibson napisa= =C5=82(a): > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 02:35:09PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski > > > > > > > > Currently there is no way for user-space to be informed about chang= es > > > > in status of GPIO lines e.g. when someone else requests the line or= its > > > > config changes. We can only periodically re-read the line-info. Thi= s > > > > is fine for simple one-off user-space tools, but any daemon that pr= ovides > > > > a centralized access to GPIO chips would benefit hugely from an eve= nt > > > > driven line info synchronization. > > > > > > > > This patch adds a new ioctl() that allows user-space processes to r= etrieve > > > > a file-descriptor for given GPIO lines which can be polled for line= status > > > > change events. > > > > > > > > Currently the events are generated on three types of status changes= : when > > > > a line is requested, when it's released and when its config is chan= ged. > > > > The first two are self-explanatory. For the third one: this will on= ly > > > > happen when another user-space process calls the new SET_CONFIG ioc= tl() > > > > as any changes that can happen from within the kernel (i.e. > > > > set_transitory() or set_debounce()) are of no interest to user-spac= e. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski > > > > --- > > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 218 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++= ++++ > > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h | 1 + > > > > include/uapi/linux/gpio.h | 36 +++++++ > > > > 3 files changed, 255 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c > > > > index d094b1be334d..be5df4bdf44b 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c > > > > @@ -547,6 +547,9 @@ static long linehandle_set_config(struct lineha= ndle_state *lh, > > > > if (ret) > > > > return ret; > > > > } > > > > + > > > > + atomic_notifier_call_chain(&desc->gdev->notifier, > > > > + GPIOLINE_CHANGED_CONFIG, d= esc); > > > > } > > > > return 0; > > > > } > > > > @@ -1148,6 +1151,212 @@ static int lineevent_create(struct gpio_dev= ice *gdev, void __user *ip) > > > > return ret; > > > > } > > > > > > > > +struct linechanged_fd_state { > > > > + struct gpio_device *gdev; > > > > + struct gpio_desc *descs[GPIOHANDLES_MAX]; > > > > + size_t numdescs; > > > > + wait_queue_head_t waitqueue; > > > > + DECLARE_KFIFO(events, struct gpioline_changed, 16); > > > > + struct mutex lock; > > > > + struct notifier_block changed_nb; > > > > +}; > > > > + > > > > +static int linechanged_fd_release(struct inode *inode, struct file= *filep) > > > > +{ > > > > + struct linechanged_fd_state *lc_state =3D filep->private_data= ; > > > > + > > > > + atomic_notifier_chain_unregister(&lc_state->gdev->notifier, > > > > + &lc_state->changed_nb); > > > > + put_device(&lc_state->gdev->dev); > > > > + kfree(lc_state); > > > > + > > > > + return 0; > > > > +} > > > > + > > > > +static __poll_t linechanged_fd_poll(struct file *filep, > > > > + struct poll_table_struct *pollt) > > > > +{ > > > > + struct linechanged_fd_state *lc_state =3D filep->private_data= ; > > > > + __poll_t events =3D 0; > > > > + > > > > + poll_wait(filep, &lc_state->waitqueue, pollt); > > > > + > > > > + mutex_lock(&lc_state->lock); > > > > + if (!kfifo_is_empty(&lc_state->events)) > > > > + events =3D EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM; > > > > + mutex_unlock(&lc_state->lock); > > > > + > > > > + return events; > > > > +} > > > > + > > > > +static ssize_t linechanged_fd_read(struct file *filep, char __user= *buf, > > > > + size_t count, loff_t *off) > > > > +{ > > > > + struct linechanged_fd_state *lc_state =3D filep->private_data= ; > > > > + unsigned int copied; > > > > + int ret; > > > > + > > > > + if (count < sizeof(struct gpioline_changed)) > > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > > + > > > > + do { > > > > + mutex_lock(&lc_state->lock); > > > > + if (kfifo_is_empty(&lc_state->events)) { > > > > + mutex_unlock(&lc_state->lock); > > > > + if (filep->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) > > > > + return -EAGAIN; > > > > + > > > > + ret =3D wait_event_interruptible(lc_state->wa= itqueue, > > > > + !kfifo_is_empty(&lc_state->ev= ents)); > > > > + if (ret) > > > > + return ret; > > > > + } else { > > > > + mutex_unlock(&lc_state->lock); > > > > + } > > > > + > > > > + if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&lc_state->lock)) > > > > + return -ERESTARTSYS; > > > > + > > > > + ret =3D kfifo_to_user(&lc_state->events, buf, count, = &copied); > > > > + mutex_unlock(&lc_state->lock); > > > > + if (ret) > > > > + return ret; > > > > + > > > > + if (copied =3D=3D 0 && (filep->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK)) > > > > + return -EAGAIN; > > > > + } while (copied =3D=3D 0); > > > > + > > > > + return copied; > > > > +} > > > > + > > > > +static const struct file_operations linechanged_fd_fileops =3D { > > > > + .release =3D linechanged_fd_release, > > > > + .owner =3D THIS_MODULE, > > > > + .llseek =3D noop_llseek, > > > > + .poll =3D linechanged_fd_poll, > > > > + .read =3D linechanged_fd_read, > > > > +}; > > > > + > > > > +static struct linechanged_fd_state * > > > > +to_linechanged_fd_state(struct notifier_block *nb) > > > > +{ > > > > + return container_of(nb, struct linechanged_fd_state, changed_= nb); > > > > +} > > > > + > > > > +static int linechanged_fd_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, > > > > + unsigned long action, void *data) > > > > +{ > > > > + struct linechanged_fd_state *lc_state =3D to_linechanged_fd_s= tate(nb); > > > > + struct gpio_desc *desc =3D data; > > > > + struct gpioline_changed chg; > > > > + int i, ret; > > > > + > > > > + for (i =3D 0; i < lc_state->numdescs; i++) { > > > > + /* Are we watching this desc? */ > > > > + if (desc =3D=3D lc_state->descs[i]) { > > > > + /* Yes - prepare the event. */ > > > > + memset(&chg, 0, sizeof(chg)); > > > > + chg.line_offset =3D gpio_chip_hwgpio(desc); > > > > + chg.event_type =3D action; > > > > + > > > > + mutex_lock(&lc_state->lock); > > > > + ret =3D kfifo_put(&lc_state->events, chg); > > > > + mutex_unlock(&lc_state->lock); > > > > + if (ret) > > > > + wake_up_poll(&lc_state->waitqueue, EP= OLLIN); > > > > + > > > > + return NOTIFY_OK; > > > > + } > > > > + } > > > > + > > > > + return NOTIFY_DONE; > > > > +} > > > > + > > > > +static int linechanged_fd_create(struct gpio_device *gdev, void __= user *ip) > > > > +{ > > > > + struct gpioline_changed_fd_request changed_req; > > > > + struct linechanged_fd_state *lc_state; > > > > + struct gpio_desc *desc; > > > > + struct file *file; > > > > + int ret, i, fd; > > > > + u32 offset; > > > > + > > > > + ret =3D copy_from_user(&changed_req, ip, sizeof(changed_req))= ; > > > > + if (ret) > > > > + return -EFAULT; > > > > + > > > > + if ((changed_req.num_lines =3D=3D 0) || > > > > + (changed_req.num_lines > GPIOHANDLES_MAX)) > > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > > + > > > > + lc_state =3D kzalloc(sizeof(*lc_state), GFP_KERNEL); > > > > + if (!lc_state) > > > > + return -ENOMEM; > > > > + > > > > + lc_state->gdev =3D gdev; > > > > + get_device(&gdev->dev); > > > > + > > > > + for (i =3D 0; i < changed_req.num_lines; i++) { > > > > + offset =3D changed_req.lineoffsets[i]; > > > > + desc =3D gpiochip_get_desc(gdev->chip, offset); > > > > + if (IS_ERR(desc)) { > > > > + ret =3D PTR_ERR(desc); > > > > + goto out_free_lc_state; > > > > + } > > > > + > > > > + lc_state->descs[i] =3D desc; > > > > + } > > > > + > > > > + lc_state->numdescs =3D changed_req.num_lines; > > > > + > > > > + init_waitqueue_head(&lc_state->waitqueue); > > > > + INIT_KFIFO(lc_state->events); > > > > + mutex_init(&lc_state->lock); > > > > + > > > > + lc_state->changed_nb.notifier_call =3D linechanged_fd_notify; > > > > + > > > > + ret =3D atomic_notifier_chain_register(&gdev->notifier, > > > > + &lc_state->changed_nb); > > > > + if (ret) > > > > + goto out_free_lc_state; > > > > + > > > > + fd =3D get_unused_fd_flags(O_RDONLY | O_CLOEXEC); > > > > + if (fd < 0) { > > > > + ret =3D fd; > > > > + goto out_unregister_notifier; > > > > + } > > > > + > > > > + file =3D anon_inode_getfile("gpio-line-changed-fd", > > > > + &linechanged_fd_fileops, > > > > + lc_state, O_RDONLY | O_CLOEXEC); > > > > + if (IS_ERR(file)) { > > > > + ret =3D PTR_ERR(file); > > > > + goto out_put_unused_fd; > > > > + } > > > > + > > > > + changed_req.fd =3D fd; > > > > + ret =3D copy_to_user(ip, &changed_req, sizeof(changed_req)); > > > > + if (ret) { > > > > + fput(file); > > > > + put_unused_fd(fd); > > > > + return -EFAULT; > > > > + } > > > > + > > > > + fd_install(fd, file); > > > > + > > > > + return 0; > > > > + > > > > +out_put_unused_fd: > > > > + put_unused_fd(fd); > > > > +out_unregister_notifier: > > > > + atomic_notifier_chain_unregister(&gdev->notifier, > > > > + &lc_state->changed_nb); > > > > +out_free_lc_state: > > > > + kfree(lc_state); > > > > + > > > > + return ret; > > > > +} > > > > + > > > > /* > > > > * gpio_ioctl() - ioctl handler for the GPIO chardev > > > > */ > > > > @@ -1238,6 +1447,8 @@ static long gpio_ioctl(struct file *filp, uns= igned int cmd, unsigned long arg) > > > > return linehandle_create(gdev, ip); > > > > } else if (cmd =3D=3D GPIO_GET_LINEEVENT_IOCTL) { > > > > return lineevent_create(gdev, ip); > > > > + } else if (cmd =3D=3D GPIO_GET_LINECHANGED_FD_IOCTL) { > > > > + return linechanged_fd_create(gdev, ip); > > > > } > > > > return -EINVAL; > > > > } > > > > @@ -1499,6 +1710,8 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_ch= ip *chip, void *data, > > > > for (i =3D 0; i < chip->ngpio; i++) > > > > gdev->descs[i].gdev =3D gdev; > > > > > > > > + ATOMIC_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(&gdev->notifier); > > > > + > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_PINCTRL > > > > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&gdev->pin_ranges); > > > > #endif > > > > @@ -2837,6 +3050,8 @@ static int gpiod_request_commit(struct gpio_d= esc *desc, const char *label) > > > > spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags); > > > > } > > > > done: > > > > + atomic_notifier_call_chain(&desc->gdev->notifier, > > > > + GPIOLINE_CHANGED_REQUESTED, desc); > > > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags); > > > > return ret; > > > > } > > > > @@ -2934,6 +3149,8 @@ static bool gpiod_free_commit(struct gpio_des= c *desc) > > > > ret =3D true; > > > > } > > > > > > > > + atomic_notifier_call_chain(&desc->gdev->notifier, > > > > + GPIOLINE_CHANGED_RELEASED, desc); > > > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags); > > > > return ret; > > > > } > > > > @@ -3097,6 +3314,7 @@ static int gpio_set_bias(struct gpio_chip *ch= ip, struct gpio_desc *desc) > > > > if (ret !=3D -ENOTSUPP) > > > > return ret; > > > > } > > > > + > > > > return 0; > > > > } > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h > > > > index a1cbeabadc69..8e3969616cfe 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h > > > > @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ struct gpio_device { > > > > const char *label; > > > > void *data; > > > > struct list_head list; > > > > + struct atomic_notifier_head notifier; > > > > > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_PINCTRL > > > > /* > > > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/gpio.h b/include/uapi/linux/gpio.h > > > > index 799cf823d493..c61429467dd4 100644 > > > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/gpio.h > > > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/gpio.h > > > > @@ -59,6 +59,40 @@ struct gpioline_info { > > > > /* Maximum number of requested handles */ > > > > #define GPIOHANDLES_MAX 64 > > > > > > > > +/** > > > > + * struct gpioline_changed_fd_request - Information about a linech= anged fd > > > > + * request > > > > + * @lineoffsets: an array of desired lines, specified by offset in= dex for the > > > > + * associated GPIO device > > > > + * @num_lines: number of lines requested in this request, i.e. the= number of > > > > + * valid fields in the above arrays, set to 1 to request a single = line > > > > + * @fd: if successful this field will contain a valid anonymous fi= le handle > > > > + */ > > > > +struct gpioline_changed_fd_request { > > > > + __u32 lineoffsets[GPIOHANDLES_MAX]; > > > > + __u32 num_lines; > > > > + int fd; > > > > +}; > > > > + > > > > > > Wouldn't the most common case be to watch all the lines on a chip? > > > How about an easy way to do that, say num_lines=3D0? > > > > > > > IMO this is too implicit - it's literally a magic value. I'd prefer to > > keep it this way for the same reason I didn't want to have implicit > > BIAS settings. I prefer the kernel uAPI to be explicit and then we can > > wrap it in simple helpers in the library. > > > > Or you could add a watch_all flag to make it explicit. > But fair enough to leave as is - it probably keeps the kernel cleaner. > > > > > +/* Possible line status change events */ > > > > +enum { > > > > + GPIOLINE_CHANGED_REQUESTED =3D 1, > > > > + GPIOLINE_CHANGED_RELEASED, > > > > + GPIOLINE_CHANGED_CONFIG, > > > > +}; > > > > + > > > > +/** > > > > + * struct gpioline_changed - Information about a change in status > > > > + * of a GPIO line > > > > + * @line_offset: offset of the line that changed relative to the g= piochip > > > > + * @event_type: one of GPIOLINE_CHANGED_REQUESTED, GPIOLINE_CHANGE= D_RELEASED > > > > + * and GPIOLINE_CHANGED_CONFIG > > > > + */ > > > > +struct gpioline_changed { > > > > + __u32 line_offset; > > > > + __u32 event_type; > > > > +}; > > > > + > > > > > > Rather than sending an event type, and requiring userspace to poll > > > LINEINFO, which is racy, how about passing the updated info flags her= e? > > > A change in the state of the GPIOLINE_FLAG_KERNEL implies the > > > GPIOLINE_CHANGED_REQUESTED or GPIOLINE_CHANGED_RELEASED, so the > > > event_type is then redundant. > > > Userspace would then only have to poll LINEINFO if they were interest= ed > > > in the consumer on GPIOLINE_CHANGED_REQUESTED. > > > > > > To sync kernel and userspace state the current state of each line > > > should be returned immediately via the fd as soon as the fd is create= d, > > > and then subsequently on any change. > > > > > > > I guess you're right. You even made me think we could go as far as to > > embed the whole gpioline_info structure in struct gpioline_changed. > > I'd still keep the event type though - otherwise we'd have to assume > > the user always calls LINEINFO_IOCTL before obtaining the LINECHANGED > > fd. > > > > I suggested sending the current state of each line as soon as the fd > is created so that you don't have to assume anything. That initial chang= e > report is effectively the same as having the user call LINEINFO on each > line at the same time - without all the race issues. > Right, I didn't get this. That means you'd have to call the ioctl() and immediately follow up with a read(). I'm not a fan of this. Especially if we were to include a timestamp - what would it refer to? > I also considered the full gpioline_info structure, as well as reporting > bulk line changes (replacing line_offset with lineoffsets and num_lines), > but then I thought it was probably better to keep it minimal and simple. > The name and consumer are relatively large. In terms of performance - we're not really degrading it as this is still not a lot of data. How about the following: 1. Move the code filling out the struct gpioline_info to a separate function in the kernel. 2. Call the new ioctl() GET_LINEINFO_FD to indicate it's an extension of GET_LINEINFO. 3. Embed struct gpioline_info in struct gpioline_info_fd so that the initial info be read when the file descriptor is created. 4. Likewise embed struct gpioline_info in struct gpioline_changed and on every status change event provide the whole set of information? > The name is immutable(??), and so is pointless to include. It is now, but let's be future-proof. I can imagine having modifiable line names in the future. The code putting this info in struct gpioline_info wouldn't be really duplicated and the size of such small structures doesn't matter much - it's still a single context switch to read it. > The consumer only changes when the line is requested, so I was willing > to live with still having to poll for that. > And what you gain by reporting bulk lines you might lose in increased > report size and associated code. OTOH it would make it explicit which > lines are being changed together... > So I could well be wrong on that - a full bulk report may be better. I'm not sure we need bulk reporting - just as we don't provide bulk GET_GPIOLINE_INFO. The corresponding ioctl() structure would get pretty complicated soon. Bartosz > > Kent. > > > > And a timestamp might be useful, as per gpioevent_data? > > > > Sure thing! > > > > Bart > > > > > > > > Kent. > > > > > > > /* Linerequest flags */ > > > > #define GPIOHANDLE_REQUEST_INPUT (1UL << 0) > > > > #define GPIOHANDLE_REQUEST_OUTPUT (1UL << 1) > > > > @@ -176,6 +210,8 @@ struct gpioevent_data { > > > > > > > > #define GPIO_GET_CHIPINFO_IOCTL _IOR(0xB4, 0x01, struct gpiochip_i= nfo) > > > > #define GPIO_GET_LINEINFO_IOCTL _IOWR(0xB4, 0x02, struct gpioline_= info) > > > > +#define GPIO_GET_LINECHANGED_FD_IOCTL \ > > > > + _IOWR(0xB4, 0x0b, struct gpioline_changed_fd_request) > > > > #define GPIO_GET_LINEHANDLE_IOCTL _IOWR(0xB4, 0x03, struct gpiohan= dle_request) > > > > #define GPIO_GET_LINEEVENT_IOCTL _IOWR(0xB4, 0x04, struct gpioeven= t_request) > > > > > > > > -- > > > > 2.23.0 > > > >