Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030257AbWARShy (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:37:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030261AbWARShy (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:37:54 -0500 Received: from hobbit.corpit.ru ([81.13.94.6]:54366 "EHLO hobbit.corpit.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030257AbWARShx (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:37:53 -0500 Message-ID: <43CE8B14.4020909@tls.msk.ru> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 21:38:12 +0300 From: Michael Tokarev Organization: Telecom Service, JSC User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20051002) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Davide Libenzi CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List , David Miller , Ulrich Drepper , Andrew Morton , David Woodhouse Subject: Re: [PATCH] pepoll_wait ... References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 716 Lines: 18 Davide Libenzi wrote: > > The attached patch implements the pepoll_wait system call, that extend > the event wait mechanism with the same logic ppoll and pselect do. The > definition of pepoll_wait is: > > int pepoll_wait(int epfd, struct epoll_event *events, int maxevents, > int timeout, const sigset_t *sigmask, size_t sigsetsize); How about epoll_pwait() instead? It looks more appropriate, for my eyes anyway. (Just a name, nothing more) /mjt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/