Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 13 Oct 2001 18:58:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 13 Oct 2001 18:58:19 -0400 Received: from mail.sirinet.net ([198.203.196.92]:44560 "EHLO mail.sirinet.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 13 Oct 2001 18:58:00 -0400 Subject: Re: Maximum size of ext2 files on ia32 is? From: John J Tobin To: L A Walsh Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3BC8AE84.48808982@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <3BC8AE84.48808982@sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.15 (Preview Release) Date: 13 Oct 2001 17:52:16 -0500 Message-Id: <1003013547.14180.1.camel@ogre> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2001-10-13 at 16:13, L A Walsh wrote: > I was hesitantly and pleasantly surprised when I was copying across an > unmounted 8G unmounted file partition via dump to an NFS partition. Until > August, regular backups splitted the dump image (used the "-M" flag to > dump) to into 4 2G files. My backup disk died so it took some time to > replace it and just got around to doing so (I know, running w/out backups > is like unprotected sex, but lets ignore that critique). So I startup > dump and it produced 1 9G file. I was a bit concerned that NFS had > a screwed up mapping of the local file, but the server confirmed the file > size. 'du' confirmed it was 8.8G, I even unmounted, forced an fsck on it > and remounted -- still 8.8G. I was allocating special partitions to > backup non-dump compatible partitions (win) to the server but find now they > can be backed up into a single 8G+ file. I notice some utils from my latest > suse72 install (stat) don't know about it either: > > du -sh * > 14M BOOT_101101.dump > 8.8G HOME_101201.dump.001 > ... > > stat HOME_101201.dump.001 > HOME_101201.dump.001: Value too large for defined data typ > > So, I have been a bit busy and distracted and all, but when did large > file support go in for the i386 arch and what is the new max files size? > > Congratulations and great work for addressing that limitation! > > Linda I had the same problem awhile back it it was attributed to using outdated fileutils. I recommend getting new ones from www.gnu.org and seeing if that fixes the problem. It fixed it when I had a similar problem. -- John Tobin ogre@sirinet.net; AOL IM: ogre7929 http://ogre.rocky-road.net http://ogre.rocky-road.net/cdr.shtml - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/