Received: by 2002:a25:7ec1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z184csp7358820ybc; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 16:01:23 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyNQK6JZJpFEM2Q/0ZtT0k8/Gw+NxpN3ex5+dAYuk+NdBzw1/2IsoZVu5fTgkPmEhfMWTz3 X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c6d7:: with SMTP id b23mr4326987eds.156.1574985683647; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 16:01:23 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1574985683; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=QdSPebbC+/0aOl/kq9/8meeIWG9SZvMNM++FW+XVixTEywosCJaOJRiIkOsp0j06ua Rdxivmx3PCMjrJRkO6kEb1vH8P58M2uNpoC2NORFp/92GgVggcOCNeeAAKx41QiJqfx/ GBiboUCl0IZYliUgfw2fKHJVhXqOgmuJsU/24lKLttiHZQVqM6n4SBM3XGv/zWG7b+RW cqXrF+UnWrZaohrMzaKYY1lq1qzIfI1TKZBk1wl8GXCogPYauT74GZAaRBmyOlMg6ZPD Sohr5qovXdLN8XvroG2A8SDPurhE5vEnHMp5so0j1FQr/fcov63vVW9dny39t/tOmoBs 3inQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=hQwL4adBgXITc3PkYkwHn1sVmJQxAI5c44/ZAMQ909k=; b=jShPIMjAq18IQb0b0qSbdj1oMzFM7eCtB7WvtT6I3YxlIIP6b5JdMB44F5HF6B4aU3 jPefkaQNX1zyfkXaVqOR5A2OsW789NssA/akPEsqqiURCvwKlHPhyobHHzvA9RpG3rTS mteMOSGe3QlL1C8va8XNuI6tK0SwPAiJe1nT9jlyEFqKa6xwO5WoDavgb8o8cKo+LOPq 5WK8Y2X0l90+NslIHN757w0V154lBIzsUZDDRyrElqn7xjkz09LmfQfU2G+vOqDGn0b+ QJHEt5YVRgifFFcbwND0E1h5ZS4nuMIQ/BHsSvjdKxZaXe72i802Pzm68tFr15IBBXRw SVKw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@jms.id.au header.s=google header.b=SzvDGgqD; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h6si12446544ejt.227.2019.11.28.16.00.59; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 16:01:23 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@jms.id.au header.s=google header.b=SzvDGgqD; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726670AbfK1X7s (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 28 Nov 2019 18:59:48 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-f196.google.com ([209.85.160.196]:42125 "EHLO mail-qt1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726582AbfK1X7s (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Nov 2019 18:59:48 -0500 Received: by mail-qt1-f196.google.com with SMTP id j5so5536785qtq.9; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 15:59:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jms.id.au; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hQwL4adBgXITc3PkYkwHn1sVmJQxAI5c44/ZAMQ909k=; b=SzvDGgqDbhXRLCNx2yAvCitr/MeJnBLqu0VZWKbEKIIM6e/tradTFioO2kNcvyLsDS N1GjfKiKATmESqzIG7MV0zf+Ge17s3lu8rITgQzXVgMQDvZ7/L80K/eSJeNsAmbp7g6C Rp5dEWUc98LpgXd+0f6qCXoBTHbIhl2BKWCIo= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hQwL4adBgXITc3PkYkwHn1sVmJQxAI5c44/ZAMQ909k=; b=dt318LtLLdBMtoneHQtMnKSbW+2Kpt+ioUQOtfRRvH1Bae0otyKNPD+kFhgOGNVymk wgnJsFbtNPHJfH+KqGg0BbWqDJzzoJUpthATYKDZ03GaAEKENm2RekZXAZvo3JtYhUPh dkge/z588b9oTr69wSev/nz9fQmQ78u5E50PCImiP3w/5aTvgKgmcePS1FzEwcPg/Vb4 mssbDua1P7rwP4s3rGbpW18aZFDq+7u7ftMfhXz3Cqw/vcPE7AnonIzrRDGLQdx6sqep g5LobTXEjrd4NHNuJ/5tE3JmobM3iLZHRlmbaqZzIvra+7qmAKSMm7G/pFkNHlfxAHji 0/Fg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWIuzw5be8bS/naqRqw6OCjP0vk92Kxlb8oCXN9SAzciqyyONfc VpmcwUlTyrkIA6Rc1SSlOuTePqvSu3k5hOnHZRg= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7292:: with SMTP id v18mr1945327qto.169.1574985585624; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 15:59:45 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <156950767876.30879.17024491763471689960.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <2758feea-8d6e-c690-5cac-d42213f2024b@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <2758feea-8d6e-c690-5cac-d42213f2024b@huawei.com> From: Joel Stanley Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 23:59:33 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] jffs2: Fix mounting under new mount API To: Hou Tao Cc: Han Xu , Sergei Shtylyov , Richard Weinberger , David Howells , David Woodhouse , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd , viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Jeffery Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 14 Nov 2019 at 12:05, Hou Tao wrote: > > Hi, > > On 2019/11/14 4:38, Han Xu wrote: > > Tested the JFFS2 on 5.4 kernel as the instruction said, still got some > > errors, any ideas? > > > > > > > With the patch, > > > > root@imx8mmevk:~# cat /proc/mtd > > dev: size erasesize name > > mtd0: 00400000 00020000 "mtdram test device" > > mtd1: 04000000 00020000 "5d120000.spi" > > root@imx8mmevk:~# mtd_debug info /dev/mtd0 > > mtd.type = MTD_RAM > > mtd.flags = MTD_CAP_RAM > > mtd.size = 4194304 (4M) > > mtd.erasesize = 131072 (128K) > > mtd.writesize = 1 > > mtd.oobsize = 0 > > regions = 0 > > > > root@imx8mmevk:~# flash_erase /dev/mtd0 0 0 > > Erasing 128 Kibyte @ 3e0000 -- 100 % complete > > root@imx8mmevk:~# mount -t jffs2 /dev/mtdblock0 test_dir/ > > root@imx8mmevk:~# mount > > /dev/mtdblock0 on /home/root/test_dir type jffs2 (rw,relatime) > > > > BUT, it's not writable. > > You should revert the following commit to make it work: > > commit f2538f999345405f7d2e1194c0c8efa4e11f7b3a > Author: Jia-Ju Bai > Date: Wed Jul 24 10:46:58 2019 +0800 > > jffs2: Fix possible null-pointer dereferences in jffs2_add_frag_to_fragtree() > > The revert needs to get into v5.4. Maybe Richard has forget about it ? I hit this today. The error I saw was: [ 4.975868] jffs2: error: (77) jffs2_build_inode_fragtree: Add node to tree failed -22 [ 4.983923] jffs2: error: (77) jffs2_do_read_inode_internal: Failed to build final fragtree for inode #5377: error -22 [ 4.994709] jffs2: Returned error for crccheck of ino #5377. Expect badness... Reverting the f2538f999345 commit fixed things. Is the revert queued for stable? Cheers, Joel