Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Sat, 30 Nov 2019 00:37:48 +0200
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To:     Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
        Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Revert patches fixing probing of interrupts
Message-ID: <20191129223418.GA15726@linux.intel.com>
References: <20191126131753.3424363-1-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20191126131753.3424363-1-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 08:17:51AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> Revert the patches that were fixing the probing of interrupts due
> to reports of interrupt stroms on some systems

Can you explain how reverting is going to fix the issue?

This is wrong way to move forward. The root cause must be identified
first and then decide actions like always in any situation.

/Jarkko