Received: by 2002:a25:7ec1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z184csp9802221ybc; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 14:53:57 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwduCyKxHc6EdcGaLD3nSS2BXORl5bJj/WDhdo4yvabnT6OWtLc+HUquXWWfxIjOpvm0S9O X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3d62:: with SMTP id r2mr9446026ejf.150.1575154437747; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 14:53:57 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1575154437; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zkzIpaJRVd7IPLLibM2mbl/jE68VjPZDxUpk53gMC9BhvMMt+QZ/Zlf/V5Fh7gHglA KGuzfHEGwNMPCBUsM8h+5hIMuY8qCTaSv4OPiVCa+EPyn8tvj7tIwBmKQiOEG8Fu/bP8 bQbIY+ZuurpneeLgGE+Ylgqki04t9tx6PfV7yzExoNeUDDP0S1WdsLp2VJH43oe/wAvv BDenqc4PGoeKHsSSPP7Sbtge30prmloiQh3HBEUzCpvtZrZX+WwFf+J8W2XHtEKiF1E3 JUf7BZLl9HGkb78PjOFVTxbjrCwYm0Pn7477IWBuztlxuTDeOuut6Rq+eKcK5t6B7Boa f+Lw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=DM1WaVRIUGvnQSzfAPiF4yttMdQv5XqK5t8psrz81pM=; b=gW3KhKF+nDPoTRCkXWw3OAgkCP1ii9LSFr0deVTig7Q0sUVcJUL2Hyg6O+irbaZ+XB j1R2RHa7OwBmX816C/fszE/GJRsKbv6wRW47vq4DFBid5TnFNHBHN5bD2KbpakNQ9FKB hqWLvPfWiQHM6b7szxBv/MeK/Em7GMFKzBWYnWcIvYr4NAgUxtXfyjDe2C3pgLrF0utV l/TepFTF5kag27mBlh/bZElU9ZZ/YT7xOtK7xvw+QKoKWk0XIGobxbTYMa+pRSiqVpHv vdiRL9OF5MtNlbyGus6vCriyHVdXJlRLU4Il/UEPpVONn/Isv5ShvWkFOEYbROltW9Hh GRrA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.s=google header.b=HVYZEgMZ; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v17si3954876edy.67.2019.11.30.14.53.22; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 14:53:57 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.s=google header.b=HVYZEgMZ; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727280AbfK3WsX (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 30 Nov 2019 17:48:23 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-f66.google.com ([209.85.167.66]:43678 "EHLO mail-lf1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727025AbfK3WsW (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Nov 2019 17:48:22 -0500 Received: by mail-lf1-f66.google.com with SMTP id l14so25134413lfh.10 for ; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 14:48:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=DM1WaVRIUGvnQSzfAPiF4yttMdQv5XqK5t8psrz81pM=; b=HVYZEgMZkuP4zDHaNbbobY2Dz+xMbjfGWVrxpFaPaoOTTjncL6tHFib/8GEOBxPSuE bobVXDofhHspX5FipXsGJeCSgZOh3vVC1d+VZx3MOUIoHrkLzDvgFtBDLiqPgabxkxcs jH9TUg0Xn8mfAS8wZ5/5Psk8+LFvcFuRpB8sE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DM1WaVRIUGvnQSzfAPiF4yttMdQv5XqK5t8psrz81pM=; b=F4WcLUx8NaicvZIsoDbWzA3om2miZdF95AJ+hmHly1LfjTA0pKde76c/4ydbqDhA5C MdhlHhb6thI8K8Me5/SrNnawQqymvNNJLksY9ggzM9+nB3w/FiycmI2kYnhVyp/6P7NO vVFbArd38dT2LBKo4u95Vqg8MsrbYoJOM6bP1HH04VThnwqGBb0w65hETdVymEC1ywJ4 jnKRL7DULqtbBDuwtLGOYjlmAYI6idhZdxjDeBh4ckuVPcpxWsmCf/3svPKpiLc8soYT C1TopU/2WeH3tE4ZVZ9HhkI+CvTRcFJIjP+8sptcu2j0uzrPrQ6fWQLL0GVMkDeN212x rSxQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWNlSRPoz6LVSKrmalR0pcLH0bKjObCe0VIBMLqy+7zNTz/rsP2 0V0FxXSgNPjAZ/2VmWODSd3i9DOZPt0= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4a61:: with SMTP id q1mr29982023lfp.36.1575154100168; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 14:48:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lf1-f42.google.com (mail-lf1-f42.google.com. [209.85.167.42]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a18sm12360827ljp.33.2019.11.30.14.48.19 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 30 Nov 2019 14:48:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf1-f42.google.com with SMTP id 203so25120393lfa.12 for ; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 14:48:19 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5a08:: with SMTP id q8mr39043729lfn.106.1575153781845; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 14:43:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <877e3hfxyq.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> In-Reply-To: <877e3hfxyq.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2019 14:42:45 -0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull powerpc/linux.git powerpc-5.5-1 tag To: Michael Ellerman , Mimi Zohar Cc: ajd@linux.ibm.com, alastair@d-silva.org, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , asteinhauser@google.com, Bjorn Helgaas , Qian Cai , chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz, chris.smart@humanservices.gov.au, Christophe Leroy , clg@kaod.org, cmr@informatik.wtf, David Hildenbrand , debmc@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Geert Uytterhoeven , gwalbon@linux.ibm.com, harish@linux.ibm.com, hbathini@linux.ibm.com, Christoph Hellwig , krzk@kernel.org, leonardo@linux.ibm.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Rasmus Villemoes , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linuxram@us.ibm.com, madalin.bucur@nxp.com, Mathieu Malaterre , msuchanek@suse.de, Nathan Chancellor , nathanl@linux.ibm.com, Nayna Jain , Nick Piggin , "Oliver O'Halloran" , oss@buserror.net, ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com, Russell Currey , sbobroff@linux.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com, tyreld@linux.ibm.com, vaibhav@linux.ibm.com, valentin@longchamp.me, yanaijie@huawei.com, YueHaibing Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [ Only tangentially related to the power parts ] On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 2:41 AM Michael Ellerman wrote: > > There's some changes in security/integrity as part of the secure boot work. They > were all either written by or acked/reviewed by Mimi. -#if (defined(CONFIG_X86) && defined(CONFIG_EFI)) || defined(CONFIG_S390) +#if (defined(CONFIG_X86) && defined(CONFIG_EFI)) || defined(CONFIG_S390) \ + || defined(CONFIG_PPC_SECURE_BOOT) This clearly should be its own CONFIG variable, and be generated by having the different architectures just select it. IOW, IMA should probably have a config IMA_SECURE_BOOT and then s390 would just do the select unconditionally, while x86 and ppc would do select IMA_SECURE_BOOT if EFI and select IMA_SECURE_BOOT if PPC_SECURE_BOOT respectively. And then we wouldn't have random architectures adding random "me me me tooo!!!" type code. Linus