Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161143AbWASBRZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2006 20:17:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161144AbWASBRZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2006 20:17:25 -0500 Received: from mx.pathscale.com ([64.160.42.68]:11403 "EHLO mx.pathscale.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161143AbWASBRY (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2006 20:17:24 -0500 Subject: Re: RFC: ipath ioctls and their replacements From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" To: Greg KH Cc: Andrew Morton , Roland Dreier , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openib-general@openib.org In-Reply-To: <20060119005316.GA26884@kroah.com> References: <1137631411.4757.218.camel@serpentine.pathscale.com> <20060119005316.GA26884@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: PathScale, Inc. Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 17:17:20 -0800 Message-Id: <1137633441.4757.228.camel@serpentine.pathscale.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 497 Lines: 15 On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 16:53 -0800, Greg KH wrote: > Use the firmware subsystem for this. It uses sysfs so ioctl needed at > all. OK. Would I be correct in thinking that drivers/firmware/dcdbas.c is a reasonable model implementation to follow?