Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp1195230ybl; Sun, 1 Dec 2019 22:50:23 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwC3UJDRVOoO1UntZhP5Rtxv8UCORhYFxBnsdHfGD0PPAQMauIq4B0CgwsFpnwn7ctG8gXY X-Received: by 2002:a50:882b:: with SMTP id b40mr8189639edb.159.1575269423541; Sun, 01 Dec 2019 22:50:23 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1575269423; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=aip1nkPQip6uDPunbfaihU9870HlP1XFoEvidD2dvuSFll8NX0rdYcPO4ecVtnXdU/ AbOF78T3LbpMD36ZA0XF8tQMpcRX/8BydvmIh9MQhtLvndyBuF1LBiPtVZQIr7sjTXWl 6JAU4h8qMduNzEKPYsmuPMDGKLou5PiBFAEtBm99gM5OTzjJKBTGAtO0eYtkWe2xpZdN GsUeiBYfymF8D8g7HSObY7Vch4DmSPpWEerl6/b0afCLSVLdY5on4Q4fEpr/cuXNu0Kw G00FizKhEg1l5Tbbi5PRqPwwm1rOM83YeVT23J3UNdi7luCOLtBfT9RuuGT61ClcsZPU Bopg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:references:in-reply-to:date :subject:cc:to:from; bh=SE7S3Pk0U4WrZY4eH0Ivsdx+ynfu0FbiZZgerWxRBmw=; b=C3MyCPcY4WZTGsSeyDe+NxZi1G4h9GnMPhhO8Gd9P53YlWtvcAOXgCQ67hXywq6i7O KPIcORNegBxHp1ntA53CCOs2zw0QzWq29QisqlEaidAUbPL486jj9jBFJcBW4lPGRUZO hJrgWjUrRx5wTWsp9xEH+p7cusEEjMODnWGiKZHK59yZIcBG3nfSdUvRT6wsLHaAjPse z8r1wirC6M5vmgMOyHpNl6H+9lNor/s5uCgtuPDC95RtucRDkcGYaNA2sWMGpFaqviZo 1tHcG3jb0Zd0VzDLdQhHL50Ic7qoSGjz0l6sS4I5v+fNf/lW6aM0JZ+wkfEDZrb4kEGk xgpw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z3si9230910ejw.217.2019.12.01.22.50.00; Sun, 01 Dec 2019 22:50:23 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727438AbfLBGqd (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 2 Dec 2019 01:46:33 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:56616 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727416AbfLBGqc (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Dec 2019 01:46:32 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id xB26ga40134774 for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 01:46:32 -0500 Received: from e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2wm6smf2yx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 01:46:31 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 06:46:29 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.198) by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.133) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Mon, 2 Dec 2019 06:46:26 -0000 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id xB26kP6b43122710 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 2 Dec 2019 06:46:25 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA0F211C07A; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 06:46:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A783311C0E1; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 06:46:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from oc0525413822.ibm.com (unknown [9.80.214.136]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 06:46:12 +0000 (GMT) From: Ram Pai To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au, paulus@ozlabs.org, mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, hch@lst.de, linuxram@us.ibm.com, andmike@us.ibm.com, sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mst@redhat.com, ram.n.pai@gmail.com, aik@ozlabs.ru, cai@lca.pw, tglx@linutronix.de, bauerman@linux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v4 2/2] powerpc/pseries/iommu: Use dma_iommu_ops for Secure VMs aswell. Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2019 22:45:24 -0800 X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 In-Reply-To: <1575269124-17885-2-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com> References: <1575269124-17885-1-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com> <1575269124-17885-2-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19120206-0012-0000-0000-0000036F7831 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19120206-0013-0000-0000-000021AB2E5F Message-Id: <1575269124-17885-3-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.95,18.0.572 definitions=2019-12-01_04:2019-11-29,2019-12-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=956 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1910280000 definitions=main-1912020059 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Commit edea902c1c1e ("powerpc/pseries/iommu: Don't use dma_iommu_ops on secure guests") disabled dma_iommu_ops path, for secure VMs. The rationale for disabling the dma_iommu_ops path, was to use the dma_direct path, since it had inbuilt support for bounce-buffering through SWIOTLB. However dma_iommu_ops is functionally much richer. Depending on the capabilities of the platform, it can handle direct DMA; with or without bounce buffering, and it can handle indirect DMA. Hence its better to leverage the richer functionality supported by dma_iommu_ops. Renable dma_iommu_ops path for pseries Secure VMs. Signed-off-by: Ram Pai --- arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c | 11 +---------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c index 0720831..6adf4d3 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c @@ -36,7 +36,6 @@ #include #include #include -#include #include #include "pseries.h" @@ -1337,15 +1336,7 @@ void iommu_init_early_pSeries(void) of_reconfig_notifier_register(&iommu_reconfig_nb); register_memory_notifier(&iommu_mem_nb); - /* - * Secure guest memory is inacessible to devices so regular DMA isn't - * possible. - * - * In that case keep devices' dma_map_ops as NULL so that the generic - * DMA code path will use SWIOTLB to bounce buffers for DMA. - */ - if (!is_secure_guest()) - set_pci_dma_ops(&dma_iommu_ops); + set_pci_dma_ops(&dma_iommu_ops); } static int __init disable_multitce(char *str) -- 1.8.3.1