Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20191129172537.31410-1-m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
In-Reply-To: <20191129172537.31410-1-m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 2 Dec 2019 12:44:48 +0100
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaSmwORgetv7aZjtgk+2OchcvQR4SBjdWQ4KsRMHuUvSg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] DA9062 PMIC features
To:     Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
Cc:     Support Opensource <support.opensource@diasemi.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
        Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>,
        Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-aspeed <linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 6:25 PM Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de> wrote:

> this series address all comments made on [1]. Patch "gpio: add support
> to get local gpio number" is splitted into:
>  - "gpio: treewide rename gpio_chip_hwgpio to gpiod_to_offset"
>  - "gpio: make gpiod_to_offset() available for other users"
> Please check the discussion [1] for more information. You need to apply
> [2] to test the new features.

I am very happy with the shape of patches (1) and (2).

I can apply these on an immutable branch and merge into the
GPIO tree at v5.5-rc1 and offer to other subsystem maintainers
to pull in so they can merge the rest of the patch series on
top.

Alternatively I can merge all the patches into the GPIO tree.

I suppose this is not so much of a MFD business at this
point so whatever the regulator maintainer prefers I suppose?

Yours,
Linus Walleij