Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 2 Dec 2019 10:21:03 -0800
From:   Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To:     Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, dave.hansen@intel.com,
        nhorman@redhat.com, npmccallum@redhat.com, serge.ayoun@intel.com,
        shay.katz-zamir@intel.com, haitao.huang@intel.com,
        andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
        kai.svahn@intel.com, bp@alien8.de, josh@joshtriplett.org,
        luto@kernel.org, kai.huang@intel.com, rientjes@google.com,
        cedric.xing@intel.com, puiterwijk@redhat.com,
        linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
        Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v24 12/24] x86/sgx: Linux Enclave Driver
Message-ID: <20191202182102.GF4063@linux.intel.com>
References: <20191129231326.18076-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
 <20191129231326.18076-13-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
 <op.0b6gvhtiwjvjmi@hhuan26-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <op.0b6gvhtiwjvjmi@hhuan26-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 09:48:43AM -0600, Haitao Huang wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 17:13:14 -0600, Jarkko Sakkinen
> <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> >+
> >+	for (c = 0 ; c < addp.length; c += PAGE_SIZE) {
> >+		if (signal_pending(current)) {
> >+			ret = -ERESTARTSYS;
> >+			break;
> >+		}
> 
> This IOC is not idempotent as pages EADDed at this point can not be
> re-EADDed again. So we can't return ERESTARTSYS

Ah, and now I remember why I opted for modifying the parameters directly
instead of including a "number processed" field.  Andy pointed out the
ERESTARTSYS thing in the original multi-page add RFC[*], so presumably
updating the params and returning ERESTARTSYS is legal/acceptable.

[*] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CALCETrUb4X9_L9RXKhmyNpfSCsbNodP=BfbfO8Fz_efq24jp8w@mail.gmail.com