Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932561AbWASGYq (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jan 2006 01:24:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932564AbWASGYq (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jan 2006 01:24:46 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:56292 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932561AbWASGYp (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jan 2006 01:24:45 -0500 Subject: Re: - add-pselect-ppoll-system-call-implementation-tidy.patch removed from -mm tree From: David Woodhouse To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20060119171708.7f856b42.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <200601190052.k0J0qmKC009977@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <1137648119.30084.94.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060119171708.7f856b42.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:24:47 +1100 Message-Id: <1137651887.30084.118.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1686 Lines: 35 On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 17:17 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > The limit on the length of lines is 80 columns and this is a hard limit. > > Statements longer than 80 columns will be broken into sensible chunks. > Descendants are always substantially shorter than the parent and are placed > substantially to the right. The same applies to function headers with a long > argument list. Long strings are as well broken into shorter strings. We can submit patches for the cases where the guidelines listed in Documentation/CodingStyle diverge from common sense. In _some_ cases, the text which one might put after the 80th column is actually important to the flow of the program and really should be put back into the 'normal' text area. That's fair enough -- I'm not arguing that we should leave 80-column text areas behind altogether. But in this case it's just the length argument to a memcpy, and there's no real information there. Similarly, people have recently been observed to start wrapping the strings in debugging printks onto a second line gratuitously. In _those_ cases, it really is counter-productive -- it's _fine_ if that text is off the right-hand side of the screen. If your editor wraps it onto the next line, then that sucks -- but at least it only sucks for _you_, and you wouldn't really benefit by the proposed 'fix' anyway, because the proposed 'fix' is just to wrap it so that it sucks for _all_ of us. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/