Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp2044579ybl; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 17:22:52 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyQFyXLSoK5nj7boeB2d7SxFNNoX9gyHVtntNsbuQHO9YfOdQdhZ6SAWDhno6lXGkcgh+EP X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:906:: with SMTP id w6mr549640oih.122.1575422571903; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 17:22:51 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1575422571; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=i2+KSqagewJd/IiLim/YQH0XnDznkvasyjkbmJ3nUbqt4Bty/D04RkDH4mMY6TnXUK PF7giIqUAi0SdYQi8p4b8t0Thk43zVjO7P71h3clIVKME9sEVZuSPfmVNzmr6h3ggQPg oefL2BwKHGcH+AAI7FXFO9D0TRuU14C30hoQ9orXbq79Lzi6ZFwTXYoSiQmh/v6v3fOE SA83dWFiOJmHNsdIp8pVa82wzSVdno6FdpwBaapJ5JHhb5XojmX4Q6ZTtbJ9hT31T9OX 2yK4Wu0EgMQSzhPIBgwJb/BISbONgMWWDfqmUI46BkC9oLsiKHi4kJvj/eXtS+s7GB8E ltUg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=x9XkBsatVRDdKpE3ddOVdjeGE/LnutNCPmO8wCbqpmM=; b=dlKY75LZmQbLbxjKtJyTvW7ppspfWIPBDVExWxVWNpLb3IboYrKf7jKWVz6ZhakaIx 9euwb4/xw/D2Ckk/55Hev9G8DuwHZ+KSNM7JKRj4HqK+zLDjHEarnd/73Edl2i/6RxG+ IZD6mSrNjwmTCNZEPJvLf6nh0xNFKfIh0+zWHf+dFidVs874TEQNPSpPMqQ5r2HsrUn3 iHtSGTQjvUuhFVvoKweLyv0G4JXra8BPLwDSHs4d2OnmAUrAosFsTRgv1eP0cwmMaTG8 jm0pjVZlc152lGs66m1qO7YleuqFNeE3w3u6lidsVzjHKo1tGT9hRPzZ2IdOGV2RCWGk ULYg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t26si2184266oth.153.2019.12.03.17.22.37; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 17:22:51 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726162AbfLDBWE (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 3 Dec 2019 20:22:04 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:50116 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726060AbfLDBWE (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Dec 2019 20:22:04 -0500 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 19DE1206DF; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 01:22:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2019 20:22:00 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Enric Balletbo i Serra , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Collabora Kernel ML , Guenter Roeck , Benson Leung , Dmitry Torokhov , fabien.lahoudere@collabora.com, Guillaume Tucker , "H. Peter Anvin" , Borislav Petkov , "the arch/x86 maintainers" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "Ahmed S. Darwish" , Geert Uytterhoeven , Alexey Brodkin , Andrew Morton , Ard Biesheuvel , Marek Szyprowski Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86_64_defconfig: Normalize x86_64 defconfig Message-ID: <20191203202200.5565c451@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <20191202211844.19629-1-enric.balletbo@collabora.com> <20191202211844.19629-2-enric.balletbo@collabora.com> <3355589d-0b0d-f30f-624c-0f781ee9cd8d@collabora.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 09:15:12 +0800 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Instead of keeping this known good config somewhere outside it should > be just equal to defconfig. There is no point to trim it with > savedefconfig and then later experience missing options (because some > option was a dependency but now is not). Instead, all visible options > (possible to select) should be explicitly defined by defconfig to > avoid what happened with DEBUG_FS. I totally agree. -- Steve