Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp95237ybl; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 22:26:48 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyJxXk5TT5upV84md0Zlk50cPI9q5VHHVfEddcWAUpe4OJ1jTJwBD3zB074yyEwIrGq2nd5 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:2306:: with SMTP id u6mr1443149ote.78.1575440808098; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 22:26:48 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1575440808; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=IYvyPVyDBJWdrWu4aEZYIa+WrepoYYd/h2rOBK03ZaOlWF9LaOwpTkvPASkJ2nWP2O Zf3XwfaT12pQGceftGoyciyoQ+PUAQFQ2NDrLTOe0LCJV4EH7F4bQBMBnRbhLcTeEUUJ anAgVbx/Jp5gjnDBCxn4N1Rt6fwPJnhueBcAycMatUJIE3yu4w8vgWZASdEbtD3Dw5n6 xmVh8HFQ5LLZ7slNSoCKhIbAa/WXPYJ52SrudNTtcbxEwxsZHDG1pfr2YobvRkPeDU0v +9xWI0Rk0kC9P9zoKntlGsIyrsqTu+j29lZFVr0tQDju1JCm7Z6/wwPK0qSG6kQ43hbx H/Og== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id; bh=/IILN8/HsWQCcTvu4VTz2zUJ2fhypi6nWH6a7/i5iuY=; b=L9sp5LZ7hnUel+kGZqAwQSo56zmI44ZiVJIXJxxPJt/RO6KY0zUNhHVFhMAX//Bt1I DaG0gSzJJ/dhAsr1fABmEQuRMpGAJ0ynLBd+wvZ/OxFGrQ2sk2kfMBAOcAt76a5esw4W kB0jBEqstEGmVvrc+bpoQmMDP+w4A3pgI82At45E1SPv2W150ullYufvmG+pBBqgqNUF 4wCO9rw5oimtt4sXtNkRytOQlRDfQBSIwX4aPbzg1mAR297kOj2DqivVNOUOhWg8V/po ISMbmVJ8Vj/lGqFiroDDf4ye4DU99q4XhR3G+6FjKgV1BkZIytTeu3Np5JEwcYWHB72k v9rQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i10si2714139otk.195.2019.12.03.22.26.35; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 22:26:48 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726913AbfLDG0E (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 4 Dec 2019 01:26:04 -0500 Received: from mga17.intel.com ([192.55.52.151]:8494 "EHLO mga17.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725791AbfLDG0E (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Dec 2019 01:26:04 -0500 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Dec 2019 22:26:04 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,276,1571727600"; d="scan'208";a="236167818" Received: from yuanwan1-mobl.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.249.174.225]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Dec 2019 22:26:02 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: thermal: Eduardo's email is bouncing From: Zhang Rui To: Florian Fainelli , Amit Kucheria , "eduval@amazon.com" , Daniel Lezcano Cc: LKML , Linux PM list Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2019 14:26:01 +0800 In-Reply-To: References: <20191123154303.2202-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com> <744357E9AAD1214791ACBA4B0B90926377666A90@SHSMSX108.ccr.corp.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2019-12-03 at 20:56 -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: > > On 11/26/2019 7:34 AM, Zhang, Rui wrote: > > Let's try Eduardo' Amazon email account before applying this one. > > How much longer do you want to give Eduardo a chance to respond? > > I would like to draw your attention towards the response time of the > thermal subsystem maintainers for a subsystem that is say medium in > traffic. > > You guys need to step up your game and give some feedback within days > and not weeks of patches being submitted, especially if this is after > 2 > or 3 requests to get feedback. > > If all of you are busy which is completely understandable then maybe > it > is time to seek help from someone else (Daniel?) who gives timely > feedback to patches submissions. > First of all, I don't want to add any new patch during the merge window. And this patch will be applied and pushed once after -rc1 released. Plus, I've already synced with Daniel, in private email though, and I will send an incremental patch to add Daniel as the co-maintainer of the thermal subsystem. thanks, rui