Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20191204101042.4275-6-cleger@kalray.eu>
In-Reply-To: <20191204101042.4275-6-cleger@kalray.eu>
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 4 Dec 2019 14:45:51 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHp75VcqqqAv1iiwjNqGVcadmdzbjHt8f_ap7DKd3LWC=wwkhw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] dt-bindings: pinctrl: dw: move sps,dwapb-gpio.txt to pinctrl
To:     Clement Leger <cleger@kalray.eu>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Hoan Tran <hoan@os.amperecomputing.com>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 12:13 PM Clement Leger <cleger@kalray.eu> wrote:
>
> Since the driver has been moved to pinctrl and now supports it, move the
> documentation into pinctrl folder. In the same time, add documentation
> for pinctrl properties such has snps,has-pinctrl and description of pin
> alternate functions.

> +- snps,has-pinctrl : If present, register the pinctrl controller.

I'm wondering why we can't always assume pin control?

> -F:     Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/snps-dwapb-gpio.txt
> +F:     Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/snps-dwapb-gpio.txt

I guess this should be a part of patch 2 when you move driver w/o
changes to a new folder.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko