Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 4 Dec 2019 14:28:12 +0100
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To:     Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: SLUB: purpose of sysfs events on cache creation/removal
Message-ID: <20191204132812.GF25242@dhcp22.suse.cz>
References: <20191126121901.GE20912@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.1911261632030.9857@www.lameter.com>
 <20191126165420.GL20912@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.1911271535560.16935@www.lameter.com>
 <20191127162400.GT20912@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.1911271625110.17727@www.lameter.com>
 <20191127174317.GD26807@dhcp22.suse.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20191127174317.GD26807@dhcp22.suse.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed 27-11-19 18:43:17, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 27-11-19 16:26:11, Cristopher Lameter wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Nov 2019, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > 
> > > Would you mind a patch that would add a kernel command line parameter
> > > that would work like memcg_sysfs_enabled? The default for the config
> > > would be on. Or it would be preferrable to simply drop only events?
> > 
> > Just drop the events may be best. Then we know if someone is using it.
> 
> I would be worried that a lack of events might be surprising and a
> potential userspace wouldn't know that something has changed.

It would be great to land with some decision here.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs