Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190113021719.46457-1-samuel@sholland.org> <20190113021719.46457-2-samuel@sholland.org>
 <472c5450-1b60-6ac7-b242-805c2a2f3272@arm.com> <CA+E=qVfaBcUN5iB3kaK5gHyURpWt7ET6_js=sLiDg4PCDXXTYA@mail.gmail.com>
 <4b922079aeed04f31ff67b3e7fb78022@www.loen.fr>
In-Reply-To: <4b922079aeed04f31ff67b3e7fb78022@www.loen.fr>
From:   Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 4 Dec 2019 07:37:13 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+E=qVc-BA_W8O1qpkKgg5pDax-Jbvmpc-TB7gWB7CfYAxXCXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] arm64: arch_timer: Workaround
 for Allwinner A64 timer instability
To:     Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc:     Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        arm-linux <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 4:21 AM Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> [please note that my email address has changed]
>
> On 2019-12-04 04:18, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Unfortunately this patch doesn't completely eliminate the jumps.
> > There
> > have been reports from users who still saw 95y jump even with the
> > patch applied.
> >
> > Personally I've seen it once or twice on my Pine64-LTS.
> >
> > Looks like we need bigger hammer. Does anyone have any idea what it
> > could be?
>
> Which kernel version did you see this happening on?

I've seen it on 5.3

>          M.
> --
> Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...