Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 3 (switchdev & TI_CPSW_SWITCHDEV)
To:     Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
        Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
References: <20191203155405.31404722@canb.auug.org.au>
 <58aebf62-54f8-9084-147b-801ea65327bb@infradead.org>
 <f2700b07-df9b-94ce-0323-a4fece236838@ti.com>
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Message-ID: <af707faa-7f95-0d6f-3f72-1746161e09a8@infradead.org>
Date:   Wed, 4 Dec 2019 08:11:11 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <f2700b07-df9b-94ce-0323-a4fece236838@ti.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 12/4/19 7:35 AM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> 
> 
> On 04/12/2019 01:43, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 12/2/19 8:54 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Please do not add any material for v5.6 to your linux-next included
>>> trees until after v5.5-rc1 has been released.
>>>
>>> Changes since 20191202:
>>
>> I am seeing this (happens to be on i386; I doubt that it matters):
>> CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST=y
>>
>>
>> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for NET_SWITCHDEV
>> ?? Depends on [n]: NET [=y] && INET [=n]
>> ?? Selected by [y]:
>> ?? - TI_CPSW_SWITCHDEV [=y] && NETDEVICES [=y] && ETHERNET [=y] && NET_VENDOR_TI [=y] && (ARCH_DAVINCI || ARCH_OMAP2PLUS || COMPILE_TEST [=y])
>>
>> because TI_CPSW_SWITCHDEV blindly selects NET_SWITCHDEV even though
>> INET is not set/enabled, while NET_SWITCHDEV depends on INET.
>>
>> However, the build succeeds, including net/switchdev/*.
>>
>> So why does NET_SWITCHDEV depend on INET?
>>
>> It looks like TI_CPSW_SWITCHDEV should depend on INET (based on the
>> Kconfig rules), but in practice it doesn't seem to matter to the build.
>>
> 
> Thanks for reporting this. I'd like to ask for some advice of how to proceed?
> a) change it to "depends on NET_SWITCHDEV" (as it's done in other drivers),
> but this will require to add NET_SWITCHDEV in defconfig

IMO TI_CPSW_SWITCHDEV should depend on NET_SWITCHDEV, as other drivers do that.

That will require to add NET_SWITCHDEV in what defconfig?
To me, it just means that whoever is doing the kernel config must enable/set
NET_SWITCHDEV first, same as other drivers that depend on NET_SWITCHDEV.

> b) change it to "imply NET_SWITCHDEV", but then NET_SWITCHDEV can be switched off
> manually or by random build and cause build failure of cpsw_new.
> To fix build below diff can be used, but TI_CPSW_SWITCHDEV will not be functional
> 
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw_new.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw_new.c
> index 71215db7934b..22e8fc548d48 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw_new.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw_new.c
> @@ -368,8 +368,9 @@ static void cpsw_rx_handler(void *token, int len, int status)
> ??????????????? page_pool_recycle_direct(pool, page);
> ??????????????? goto requeue;
> ??????? }
> -
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_SWITCHDEV
> ??????? skb->offload_fwd_mark = priv->offload_fwd_mark;
> +#endif
> ??????? skb_reserve(skb, headroom);
> ??????? skb_put(skb, len);
> ??????? skb->dev = ndev;
> 
> Thank you.
> 


-- 
~Randy
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>