Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp1490011ybl; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 02:14:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyVOP8XnEHo0ZVR6QS2fw2dVKkRR3HxIbL+UNlhftSDupZOR6DrUtNvGE7kUKKWI80CoLGz X-Received: by 2002:aca:b2c5:: with SMTP id b188mr649832oif.55.1575540850096; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 02:14:10 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1575540850; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ZOS8gWB2VWVWNbGYZ5LRX2eL2euPbmKbRrD/fIJVb/h8Q2agicq6fuwHpEP+lFApXE psrl0fHDHAWSRK1PJOZdLa9Gm3/t+MctP/Xdm0uNhPrPp50X9UpxG+umgp4qfFzzxeAg leTx1K/+T+77nvoWmYVfLYhAt082HYZxCzlCJxtS9jzR6PoxLVhyYOM5D1oZl086ezRH +rXlH2+Rn6zCqi5RgKDcJ9YzfUi34XVQx4ZhEeqMaQ2moYbf7wfSWrzpO70V9ykUd5I8 b+miWYITk+4oo2noa5LUK5VhI3eMbVvI0Nv7lakQziMAEdFI1dwt552wpL9n10g5kkKZ MWgg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references:cc:to :subject; bh=yj3a1lyDiyIvQVR/FP59tZY6oaExhn7EPE5SYaP0tok=; b=zInxfhn2GSS4esH49D+fU8H94vTdvaMOEOWxkaB0oBkpxZke+ed+d7Y4y+JGWHrJU+ nE40ugB4BNlIOGygqQUmiwqAopx2FFB6Nf5MoxCsasy+yhAh8BYGLHCorTUrOGLwGRXQ vj1WCJZMkxh4XPpNc2/y33zw2Yj52F5es+5KviszapyVAXV3+DrMa0Djc9VQ4gtRsQjE lrMg2COb/AOhDLE04w+LZ63VVe3K0sNje+1vHE+H+Aoc7fSeOWqPiMwKZzEdP7q0f0NG uYt1l+LgH2FbIl3OooZwNWqHTibmLv6vsnWf0UwCAyW5uCMQnhK4LfEGqOW4dHPac3Tm T8kw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o67si4594183oig.49.2019.12.05.02.13.58; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 02:14:10 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729278AbfLEKNZ (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 5 Dec 2019 05:13:25 -0500 Received: from out30-42.freemail.mail.aliyun.com ([115.124.30.42]:46702 "EHLO out30-42.freemail.mail.aliyun.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729041AbfLEKNX (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Dec 2019 05:13:23 -0500 X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R231e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01e07486;MF=luoben@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=6;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0Tk2.yQt_1575540761; Received: from bn0418deMacBook-Pro.local(mailfrom:luoben@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0Tk2.yQt_1575540761) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Thu, 05 Dec 2019 18:13:12 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] genirq/vfio: Introduce irq_update_devid() and optimize VFIO irq ops To: Thomas Gleixner , Alex Williamson Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tao.ma@linux.alibaba.com, gerry@linux.alibaba.com, nanhai.zou@linux.alibaba.com References: <20190913114452.5e05d8c4@x1.home> From: Ben Luo Message-ID: <8e7961d5-c27e-4921-45ff-af8cc8946ac3@linux.alibaba.com> Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 18:12:41 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Thomas, Could you please take a look at this again, just a friendly reminder :) Thanks,     Ben 在 2019/9/16 下午10:16, Thomas Gleixner 写道: > On Fri, 13 Sep 2019, Alex Williamson wrote: > >> On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 14:30:16 +0800 >> Ben Luo wrote: >> >>> A friendly reminder. >> The vfio patch looks ok to me. Thomas, do you have further comments or >> a preference on how to merge these? I'd tend to prefer the vfio >> changes through my branch for testing and can pull the irq changes with >> your approval, but we could do the reverse or split them and I could >> follow with the vfio change once the irq changes are in mainline. > I can provide you a branch, once I looked again at that stuff. It's > somewhere in that huge conference induced backlog. > > Thanks, > > tglx