Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190621095252.32307-1-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
 <20190621095252.32307-17-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> <20191204135159.GA7210@roeck-us.net>
 <6cdf4734-4065-09c1-8623-1bf523b38c1b@arm.com> <20191204161641.GA28130@roeck-us.net>
 <e35a7f71-2477-fa52-01e4-301199e99c2e@arm.com> <CAAdtpL71ED3zbkHMqtd1XFQwToOctWJpy2WPqahxHR81fKdTkg@mail.gmail.com>
 <a391048e-f57c-159e-7174-d9d38d8f3825@arm.com> <CAK8P3a1krE=nOi6Dy=QaWiE9VTgNpUVbrHUVm_3Cq+JGJyuwKQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a1krE=nOi6Dy=QaWiE9VTgNpUVbrHUVm_3Cq+JGJyuwKQ@mail.gmail.com>
From:   =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu=2DDaud=C3=A9?= <f4bug@amsat.org>
Date:   Thu, 5 Dec 2019 15:56:15 +0100
Message-ID: <CAAdtpL5cMZQPa-SdMdi3SZnO=3-FkTkDCZjgjyy5Gmcqo+-MXw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 16/25] arm: Add support for generic vDSO (causing crash)
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc:     Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
        Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Mark Salyzyn <salyzyn@android.com>,
        Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
        Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
        Huw Davies <huw@codeweavers.com>,
        Shijith Thotton <sthotton@marvell.com>,
        Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 12:02 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 11:00 AM Vincenzo Frascino
> <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Philippe,
> >
> > On 05/12/2019 09:42, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > > There are only 2 "Investigated-by" vs 7k+ "Suggested-by"... Is there a
> > > real difference?
> >
> > Not sure about that. My take is that Suggested-by is used when someone suggests
> > you how to possibly implement a feature and you go and do that. Investigated-by
> > is when there is a fix to make and someone comes to you with the exact solution
> > like in this case Arnd did.
>
> It's not a standard tag, but I suggested it because it does explain
> better what I did.
>
> You could also just explain in clear text that I did the analysis and then add
> the more normal Suggested-by tag, I don't care either way.

No problem, I was just wondering the subtle difference between both tags.
I don't mind which one you use, as long as this issue get fixed :)
Thanks for the patch BTW!

Regards,

Phil.

>       Arnd