Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750730AbWATI3N (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jan 2006 03:29:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750731AbWATI3N (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jan 2006 03:29:13 -0500 Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:11495 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750730AbWATI3N (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jan 2006 03:29:13 -0500 Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:28:33 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20060120.002833.66197299.davem@davemloft.net> To: lkml@tlinx.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.16-rc1 From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <43D09C21.6030607@tlinx.org> References: <69304d110601171304h34c16fbfuf59df390c0fc58fd@mail.gmail.com> <43D09C21.6030607@tlinx.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2.53 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 674 Lines: 16 From: "L. A. Walsh" Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:15:29 -0800 > That seems a bit unproductive given the amount of patches > that get sent to the list. It would be easier for senders > and, likely, readers to sort through topics if people could > put patches in 1 post rather than sending 10-20 consecutive > "[PATCH XX/30]"... As postmaster, I strongly disagree. Having to split up large patches is a feature. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/