Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 6 Dec 2019 08:29:19 -0800
From:   Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
To:     Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
Cc:     arm-soc <arm@kernel.org>, soc@kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] tee subsys fixes for v5.4 (take two)
Message-ID: <20191206162919.vilrybgbiewdl4d2@localhost>
References: <20191115105353.GA26176@jax>
 <20191116234048.oas2rlfwxlz65jvp@localhost>
 <CAHUa44EQ-1SUd0dDBp43_EGPMPArq_g8=1hSKZ3EC0uELUKH_A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHUa44FaxiMrGwOLPrej_zMrVFyBExfPTqeHfYfocpc8x8LzLg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHUa44FaxiMrGwOLPrej_zMrVFyBExfPTqeHfYfocpc8x8LzLg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 10:57:47AM +0100, Jens Wiklander wrote:
> Hi Olof,
> 
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 3:22 PM Jens Wiklander
> <jens.wiklander@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 12:45 AM Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 11:53:53AM +0100, Jens Wiklander wrote:
> > > > Hello arm-soc maintainers,
> > > >
> > > > Please pull these OP-TEE driver fixes. There's one user-after-free issue if
> > > > in the error handling path when the OP-TEE driver is initializing. There's
> > > > also one fix to to register dynamically allocated shared memory needed by
> > > > kernel clients communicating with secure world via memory references.
> > > >
> > > > "tee: optee: Fix dynamic shm pool allocations" is now from version 2 which
> > > > includes a fix up with a small but vital dependency.
> > > >
> > > > If you think it's too late for v5.4 please queue this for v5.5 instead.
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I noticed you based this on -rc3 -- all our other branches are on -rc2 or
> > > older.
> >
> > I'm sorry, I thought -rc3 was old enough. I'll stick to -rc2 or older
> > in next time.
> >
> > >
> > > Anyway, I brought this in to the fixes branch, it's the only thing we have
> > > queued up at this time so I'll give it a few days in -next before I send it in.
> 
> It looks like the two patches in this pull request
> (https://git.linaro.org/people/jens.wiklander/linux-tee.git/tag/?h=tee-fixes-for-v5.4)
> are still in -next and haven't got any further. Is there anything
> wrong? Something I should fix?

They were in our fixes branch and didn't go in yet, but will shortly.


-Olof