Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp3604273ybl; Sun, 8 Dec 2019 19:07:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxapzwFiYyJqDlmOatEce4yPt65Ifwn58O3TcrtzV4zia9xvc+SefXvDoZlcis5IHC51oun X-Received: by 2002:aca:53c6:: with SMTP id h189mr23127918oib.11.1575860845622; Sun, 08 Dec 2019 19:07:25 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1575860845; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=qc0a84OWjDO1ZMHYZYx415zpDSww3ZINsva1jL+oG1zRrRLz9c7EdNrhu1y+pJNEtG tCMaW+fByFSXFv+TdoI32MVBWVvN7ufIKH4kzSVG1JwEZo9SFlGTl+stjoGXfMjHp8xi mh5kVfT0YRMxviOBkDLaWmRFVh33eMZTavsYoazQqtO/CSbVft4rFX6YKveiAAAi2sL3 EZIemc+aqvhaVgjVb7AyEnW5gX9It73SAaTn102HhTfrsxoucFugLaVVxyg+7eks1/LH U/yNxS295KcBQI0cwc5L/A2XhHPctCr16qPBO/PI79UiEU6JftTVh/743B5U8Y7EoUki wY4g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=1RBjT3I4vVNDyP8kyBx6QjYemFFEtfhToS0qVoLDtzM=; b=Zbq+aebF7oF5RbJ1ynJFI5DoglVCd5nLQ7ZtB19etRP14wgYwa7FalDuovxltUxGH3 XN86z/cuuuD1Az2fbxSzTxc+heMaeAW1BJXsQWSOcDlNVzyfgwZ07aCePEhl1g1pQ9EN cQ/gEGEoJtS1WLLzeqd/4WhW8OWQVTz+LN/p6F1pndSfKENAj0s2nqHEfRNqWi9agRIB lZc1sfOPCVmI7ofo+WEZWIAUYSXupBuokkIsj61zYnHIvNApowksdYkf18h1uAQgbJIw 1Lz67zkoFHN4uSf8uX7KbiW497Hjlgb6vA8Zyu7rZVO5HGmnJNPA7HqtYohMk6HiJ4aO Qyuw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 123si10887647oif.177.2019.12.08.19.07.14; Sun, 08 Dec 2019 19:07:25 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726951AbfLIDFP (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 8 Dec 2019 22:05:15 -0500 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:31796 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726748AbfLIDFO (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Dec 2019 22:05:14 -0500 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Dec 2019 19:05:14 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,294,1571727600"; d="scan'208";a="412614427" Received: from hao-dev.bj.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.238.157.65]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Dec 2019 19:05:12 -0800 Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2019 10:45:27 +0800 From: Wu Hao To: Will Deacon Cc: mdf@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, atull@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] add performance reporting support to FPGA DFL drivers Message-ID: <20191209024527.GA22625@hao-dev> References: <1573622695-25607-1-git-send-email-hao.wu@intel.com> <20191125033412.GB890@hao-dev> <20191125080127.GC1809@willie-the-truck> <20191125080839.GA6227@hao-dev> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191125080839.GA6227@hao-dev> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 04:08:39PM +0800, Wu Hao wrote: > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 08:01:28AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 11:34:12AM +0800, Wu Hao wrote: > > > Hi Will and Mark, > > > > > > Could you please help us on review this patchset? as this patchset mainly > > > introduced a new perf driver following the similar way as drivers/perf/*. > > > > Why is it not under drivers/perf/, then? > > Hi Will > > Thanks for the quick response. This is one sub feature for DFL based FPGAs, > and we plan to put this sub feature together with others, including related > documentation. It only registers a standard perf pmu for its userspace > interfaces. > > > > > > This patchset has been submitted for a long time but didn't receive any > > > comment after v4. we appreciate any review comments! thanks in advance. :) > > > > Hmm, not sure I saw the previous versions. Guessing I wasn't on cc? > > We switched to perf API from v4, and started ccing you and Mark from v5. :) Hi Will Did you get a chance to look into this patchset? Thanks Hao > > Thanks > Hao > > > > > Will