Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 14 Oct 2001 05:52:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 14 Oct 2001 05:51:53 -0400 Received: from johnsl.lnk.telstra.net ([139.130.12.152]:56584 "HELO ns.higherplane.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 14 Oct 2001 05:51:45 -0400 Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 19:51:55 +1000 From: john slee To: Paul Gortmaker Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Making diff(1) of linux kernels faster Message-ID: <20011014195154.A5511@higherplane.net> In-Reply-To: <3BC953B5.18870B14@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3BC953B5.18870B14@yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Oct 14, 2001 at 04:58:29AM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > So, with the cold cache, my patch cut the time by a factor of 5(!!) > and the amount of audible death growls from the disk is also reduced. > In the warm case, you pay a slight penalty since the simple hack > doesn't try to keep the file data around while priming the cache. excellent. how does it go on other kernels? (solaris? irix? win32?) j. -- R N G G "Well, there it goes again... And we just sit I G G G here without opposable thumbs." -- gary larson - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/