Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751074AbWATQgu (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jan 2006 11:36:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751073AbWATQgu (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jan 2006 11:36:50 -0500 Received: from free.wgops.com ([69.51.116.66]:63500 "EHLO shell.wgops.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751072AbWATQgt (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jan 2006 11:36:49 -0500 Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 09:36:35 -0700 From: Michael Loftis To: James Courtier-Dutton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Development tree, PLEASE? Message-ID: <6769FDC09295B7E6078A5089@d216-220-25-20.dynip.modwest.com> In-Reply-To: <43D10FF8.8090805@superbug.co.uk> References: <43D10FF8.8090805@superbug.co.uk> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.4 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact support@wgops.com X-MailScanner: WGOPS clean X-MailScanner-From: mloftis@wgops.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1873 Lines: 48 --On January 20, 2006 4:29:44 PM +0000 James Courtier-Dutton wrote: > It is unclear what you are really ranting about here. The "stable" kernel > is stable or at least as stable as it is going to be. It is left to > distros to make it even more stable. The interface to user land has not > changed. > If all you are ranting about is the move from devfs to udevd, then all > the user land tools dealing with them have been updated already. That's the nail on the head exactly. Why is this being done in an even numbered kernel? This represents an API change that has knock on well outside of the kernel, and should be done in development releases. Why is it LK is the only major project (that I know of) that does this? This is akin to apache changing the format of httpd.conf and saying in say 1.3.38 and saying 'well we made the userland tools too.' > > What is the real specific problem you are having? Well there's a whole grab bag of them that I'll be getting to over the next few months, but the most immediate is the fact that I've gotten new hardware from a venduh that requires me to build a new Debian installer and new debian kernels. I also have custom packages that depend on devfs being there and now it's not. Yes I realise this change isn't out of the blue or anything, but it's in a 'stable' kernel. Why bother calling 2.6 stable? We may as well have stayed at 2.5 if this sort of thing is going to continue to be pulled. > > James > > -- "Genius might be described as a supreme capacity for getting its possessors into trouble of all kinds." -- Samuel Butler - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/