Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751080AbWATQpT (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jan 2006 11:45:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751081AbWATQpT (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jan 2006 11:45:19 -0500 Received: from eurogra4543-2.clients.easynet.fr ([212.180.52.86]:64640 "HELO briare1.heliogroup.fr") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751080AbWATQpR (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jan 2006 11:45:17 -0500 From: Hubert Tonneau To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au Subject: Re: [PATCH 000 of 5] md: Introduction Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 18:05:29 GMT Message-ID: <0610KX512@briare1.heliogroup.fr> X-Mailer: Pliant 94 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1721 Lines: 35 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Please report any fusion problems to Eric Moore at LSI, the Adaptec driver > must unfortunately be considered unmaintained. Done several time over more than two years, but new versions did not solve the problem, even if in 2.6.13 it forwards the problem to MD instead of just locking the bus. Also, production quality verification is something really hard to verify since even on production servers it requires several monthes to tigger some very rare situations, and on the production server I've finaly replaced the partialy faulty disk so that the problem may well never append again on the box. So the problem is probably still there in the driver, maybe not, but I have no way to validate new drivers. To be more precise, last 2.4.xx have production quality fusion driver, only 2.6.xx driver has problems. The last point is that if you look at the last changes in the fusion driver, they are moving evrything around to introduce the SAS, so after more than a year of unsuccessfull reports about a single bug that appends on production server, you can understand that my willing to make tests with potencial production consequences has vanished. The fusion maintainer is responsive, did his best, but could not achieve the result, so he may have not received enough help from general kernel maintainers, or the kernel or the fusion drivers might start to be too complicated. I stop here because I do not want to start flames. Just report. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/