Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750910AbWATRLq (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:11:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750930AbWATRLq (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:11:46 -0500 Received: from uproxy.gmail.com ([66.249.92.201]:580 "EHLO uproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750901AbWATRLp convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:11:45 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=JtLRWD21AeaiMQskHUooW8s3O46qMXzb441lXq1m8lcnTJ1PjQRNQj2sCicMx9cB0SXoxxkmb5VUsd2zT/qBEps1ihh5AamcHRU+IgNRjJrDPiVrB/WbBlv0EXwD7JoenPw+hSVFFuF5BsTjNTBiYvOwMbbX6UTQ6S0z6xlnxTg= Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 18:11:24 +0100 From: Diego Calleja To: Michael Loftis Cc: James@superbug.co.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Development tree, PLEASE? Message-Id: <20060120181124.847b44bc.diegocg@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6769FDC09295B7E6078A5089@d216-220-25-20.dynip.modwest.com> References: <43D10FF8.8090805@superbug.co.uk> <6769FDC09295B7E6078A5089@d216-220-25-20.dynip.modwest.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.1.9 (GTK+ 2.8.9; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1467 Lines: 29 El Fri, 20 Jan 2006 09:36:35 -0700, Michael Loftis escribi?: > That's the nail on the head exactly. Why is this being done in an even > numbered kernel? This represents an API change that has knock on well > outside of the kernel, and should be done in development releases. Why is > it LK is the only major project (that I know of) that does this? This is > akin to apache changing the format of httpd.conf and saying in say 1.3.38 > and saying 'well we made the userland tools too.' There's a Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt file. Is not that devfs and other features were removed suddenly from one day to another. If external developers don't care about maintaining code in (say) a 6 month timeframe kernel developers can't do nothing. External developers are encouraged to merge their code in the main tree anyway. It's strange that you mention the devfs case. People wanted to remove devfs one or maybe two years ago, and Linus and/or akpm decided to kept it to give people time to migrate. Please see the archives to understand why the people who maintains the kernel and gets their ass kicked when a stable released has a bug decided to set up this development model. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/