Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp4251446ybl; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 07:50:43 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzINSKIC0X5DD64EME0ly1Zc0TapT+fJkZ2pg0zZMM1vJYaQZ+3Fq3yDTusbU980F+XAf12 X-Received: by 2002:aca:90a:: with SMTP id 10mr9325509oij.81.1575906643374; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 07:50:43 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1575906643; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Bifg9QPdPgDV52UR1DUj333sQTVLeAT2U2ENtSGZbdRu2XLkRDLU1dGPFyN23JsL+I k2VpEXS9Spjp5rGIAYRk8OnBwx2ipOVtgPsSUGBoILxip0hGGKSzhvoN5GAOqGKM5quc VNlXql5xvdWKpxssyjVmrt0rCOi6+/qti+URgxhyk5tJqZXGoHQWRWDBOi8Mj+c9yznm M6yJtd0ZhpZWsR6QN8c7jR3P/vukwCy2hv+pdHUk19BgdsWw/yszNwtWPJtojaltmqM9 fDkcQzidb2aqXanNCV49EC1gQLBw4WThOKWpWnHW9kcITGwghJwYLYB6YnylG0VSEckd 6PwQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=URL9SoGdnJ0PoRRV99LP3hp3iNBvf/p3Nnm62nAHDnw=; b=ZsLTDG/Rw3CubtvMOkzxb6nBM9QqBqVvPWJ5tiBIFBZcQf/4csqy0F6BXEPqgtSyZz 0TRhz86E4D5mbZrNqAYGED2aMhx6uBOruVKsE0kskiEUlA23HG1GFnT02lRUGfcca3Jc MLebSfsOsOX8Ro/d+jXoaJkEJWVxsP0t0Js1FV7WcLnitYOvwFx4NTZ7IlXiGLD6ggEg 3TDhhi/l8eVWgpfO61+Vv6jRU5tYUL/lQHXt+m1ht8bj4/8hXTnEpF0JnW4/WNSIw0+4 ZKGq67svbReVRHinjV822MN+wG+vWxy4o6fbgWywKfsk+ixjsu5soBbFxSbgL5sbIPc8 QTcw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l19si38432oib.48.2019.12.09.07.50.31; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 07:50:43 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726562AbfLIPth (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 9 Dec 2019 10:49:37 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:36482 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726197AbfLIPth (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Dec 2019 10:49:37 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F2DB1FB; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 07:49:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com (e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.195.21]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C7D143F718; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 07:49:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2019 15:49:32 +0000 From: Qais Yousef To: Marc Zyngier Cc: Hannes Reinecke , John Garry , Ming Lei , tglx@linutronix.de, chenxiang66@hisilicon.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hare@suse.com, hch@lst.de, axboe@kernel.dk, bvanassche@acm.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/1] genirq: Make threaded handler use irq affinity for managed interrupt Message-ID: <20191209154932.dyysdktbosi3vlbx@e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1575642904-58295-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> <1575642904-58295-2-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> <20191207080335.GA6077@ming.t460p> <78a10958-fdc9-0576-0c39-6079b9749d39@huawei.com> <305198e5-f76f-ded4-946b-9cfade18f08c@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/09/19 15:17, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 2019-12-09 15:09, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > > [slight digression] > > > My idea here is slightly different: can't we leverage SMT? > > Most modern CPUs do SMT (I guess even ARM does it nowadays) > > (Yes, I know about spectre and things. We're talking performance here > > :-) > > I only know two of those: Cavium TX2 and ARM Neoverse-E1. There's the Cortex-A65 too. -- Qais Yousef > ARM SMT CPUs are the absolute minority (and I can't say I'm displeased). > > M, > -- > Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...