Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 9 Dec 2019 18:51:19 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To:     Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Cc:     Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-imx@nxp.com,
        kernel@pengutronix.de, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] ARM i.MX6q: make sure PHY fixup for KSZ9031 is
 applied only on one board
Message-ID: <20191209175119.GK9099@lunn.ch>
References: <20191209084430.11107-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
 <20191209171508.GD9099@lunn.ch>
 <20191209173952.qnkzfrbixjgi2jfy@pengutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20191209173952.qnkzfrbixjgi2jfy@pengutronix.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

> Yes. all of them are broken.
> I just trying to not wake all wasp at one time. Most probably there are
> board working by accident. So, it will be good to have at least separate
> patches for each fixup.

I agree about a patch per fixup. Can you try to generate such patches?
See if there is enough history in git to determine which boards
actually need these fixups?

Thanks
	Andrew