Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 9 Dec 2019 12:44:40 -0800
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To:     Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: Fix test_async_driver_probe if NUMA is
 disabled
Message-ID: <20191209204440.GA1584@roeck-us.net>
References: <20191127202453.28087-1-linux@roeck-us.net>
 <4a2aa8554933c2d004761d5f3e8132018be5ea27.camel@linux.intel.com>
 <377feb00-9288-e03c-b8a7-26ba87e24927@roeck-us.net>
 <b5826338cd4479b724835ea5469c5a8318e88e2c.camel@linux.intel.com>
 <dfc50096-d95f-8e57-4ba2-3fc122626af8@roeck-us.net>
 <f82041432512481569071a83e727cfb9f128126d.camel@linux.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <f82041432512481569071a83e727cfb9f128126d.camel@linux.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 09:18:28AM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > 
> > I thought the code is specifically checking devices which it previously
> > created, which are well defined and understood test devices. After all,
> > the check is in the test driver's probe function. Guess I really don't
> > understand the code. Please take my patch as bug report, and submit
> > whatever fix you think is correct.
> 
> Sorry I had overlooked that this is the test code.
> 
> I suppose it should be fine since we specify the node ID for all instances
> where we register an asychronous test device.
> 

That isn't exacly an endorsement. Would you mind submitting a patch
that is acceptable for you ? I'll be more than happy to test it.

Thanks,
Guenter