Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp4597321ybl; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 13:38:12 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxhXzlv+jqDNDU9KzfntROaRo4t/S5OQARhkE8MI7BG2fXk3WCALPHCe2iFNj0FE0Cv3p// X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:aac:: with SMTP id r12mr1118208oij.59.1575927491988; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 13:38:11 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1575927491; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=jT/GNociIf0x1UFiS/nuReArDjPyyqbtyZFqzfTyhYnZdJWTVc0V7NFZui96i7m5Te AGj+ZJAMHif5fJ+WVYHzmWpwaZuf3ejPBdyD8ubJeJh1pakEGk+wk5hXyR1X8dEn3XgT fP1HfsRFRjza2imWFr03oYow1dlOyUrAe5movwvnC61t3G+t+2r4FasW8hHZw5afdorC rPyOUr4bAkSBBteqDAKd8vLCnpIwuvpSaG7PrBANCFV8CGp1m8ga4b3J4cUSMFW0DGvK /A9thE5hfppBxHcRzi7s7Y6MUPjRA8atAMnlhqySzgUTeeMSs7rTXSNuDGU8Q6rgZy5n yTeA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject; bh=fZxWigdMEQB0RZO/zVPDqzjXEcCb1dksHbglYYhR6Gc=; b=VafM5k56kA43ossRtKELPEpvegOvAOBqQs3Sl9UFczEZde2pnD/G6Dd/L2pREbo2ji 714S9X4blP7r9N1wwurc+h6S/7JZfk8uUI3fafnOJXK0W++BG843PmonlkHOcxjlSYAT yhDN/Nv7obbk1JQCk2qeq9HrnFOdssNH2PIeipXisk5EsxFwW4F/hdnfOGo7QgVTrW+g xm4hEbo33FKlae4kCx/bDy6REIagM8M3eBNCL6Rvb+HXl19j7uxk+bsjehz8cYEWyt+7 sVP+eoXHc9pM4Ve51zRklg/jSkTSQnLc348KFXN0xObSUy7RIGKvLUUcPHmO67NSPtH6 XOdw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s2si813204otd.190.2019.12.09.13.37.59; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 13:38:11 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726879AbfLIVhZ (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 9 Dec 2019 16:37:25 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:32414 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726708AbfLIVhZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Dec 2019 16:37:25 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id xB9LbMY8081235 for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 16:37:24 -0500 Received: from e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.97]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2wskna2qc3-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 16:37:23 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 21:37:04 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.197) by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.131) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Mon, 9 Dec 2019 21:37:00 -0000 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id xB9Lawl152625544 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 9 Dec 2019 21:36:58 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9511A42042; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 21:36:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D2784203F; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 21:36:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dhcp-9-31-102-17.watson.ibm.com (unknown [9.31.102.17]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 21:36:57 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/9] powerpc: Enabling IMA arch specific secure boot policies From: Mimi Zohar To: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michael Ellerman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Ard Biesheuvel , Jeremy Kerr , Eric Ricther , "Oliver O'Halloran" , Nayna Jain Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2019 16:36:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: <5254346f-4ba7-c820-e127-d46b84f2e6e6@linux.microsoft.com> References: <1572492694-6520-1-git-send-email-zohar@linux.ibm.com> <5254346f-4ba7-c820-e127-d46b84f2e6e6@linux.microsoft.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19120921-4275-0000-0000-0000038D66CB X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19120921-4276-0000-0000-000038A115A8 Message-Id: <1575927416.4557.25.camel@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.95,18.0.572 definitions=2019-12-09_04:2019-12-09,2019-12-09 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=943 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1910280000 definitions=main-1912090170 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2019-12-09 at 12:27 -0800, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote: > Hi Mimi, > > On 10/30/2019 8:31 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote: > > > This patchset extends the previous version[1] by adding support for > > checking against a blacklist of binary hashes. > > > > The IMA subsystem supports custom, built-in, arch-specific policies to > > define the files to be measured and appraised. These policies are honored > > based on priority, where arch-specific policy is the highest and custom > > is the lowest. > > Has this change been signed off and merged for the next update of the > kernel (v5.5)? Yes, refer to the linuxppc mailing list archives. Mimi [1] https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/