Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp4672932ybl; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 15:04:01 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwTcA3068S6ak5pAhw8/5vCMLIDbKd5T86rEdwW1Uup5/IP0APJeGOC865Rv9BHAgpA+inw X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7a4d:: with SMTP id z13mr20072438otm.148.1575932641189; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 15:04:01 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1575932641; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=VPAt6KxeTBPwkPxs2WzyjB1/9vn0JguzxpgTjvMmGZ6lQ8VRuCamWpZTJ4Y3GeLdaL Epv8NA0Rtrezw6ibiw0FlGWbzFObe6h1hEqtUPfZ2Rg/Pojq2kyfQXYF7tM3I1O+AoXW t4mBx64Kh9vhQHEuFhMlmLt0uvPSi5LEXnS0a+zAyXALUtJE5znS4XBLIuwRvQE7dqFW I5yHXKwbWCLlIqNU7EQafnLnuHD9mGwPJtfWLFV89FXSfsC+GVCr7Kx3wcWl1AQnHNuK EVEMgv16OGttnG7NU9NwFhfOCYRU0Rlq8wKsf6+kjfnbv2Fnacp9WWZqzmt/Vw2a2VZ9 IAqA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:dkim-signature:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:references:cc:to:from:subject; bh=RD/UuYFLXtwBxgHk80kzPJPqxUQ1zAc8jBfi48zHg7Y=; b=athmBc1oSpvBWUG8mh83WZTMMTBk9qtMymVMjiCbgHRJINbWHYqT6xqJ+NEe59u1kf litX1BtxbIwBnPyEComT7EANScLBNa3Kn9h+svxzW9W096jW0L+UII2X3022fk/yK+Qn ezlV0yVdOuAuwi8N/7XpZ4HdSSxxsQK2KOG/vTN4r0/73D3VF02ChHLNCjYey53B9s1T uLgs7kRVFY4PyHt2bU4rzbYAlMRYnN/6PKEKnZX83kk7ATfKmYIFdEvw0SoXLmWgFww4 Td45rcXFaH1xC4yqijE8GrmyhFk2gkUerntuKRzy0SM/7djABdvqNI86vFyKKFqBk6Ju lcKQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@nvidia.com header.s=n1 header.b=AF+ZrVUh; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=nvidia.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s17si737849otr.155.2019.12.09.15.03.48; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 15:04:01 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@nvidia.com header.s=n1 header.b=AF+ZrVUh; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=nvidia.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727075AbfLIXDT (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 9 Dec 2019 18:03:19 -0500 Received: from hqnvemgate25.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.64]:10959 "EHLO hqnvemgate25.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726207AbfLIXDS (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Dec 2019 18:03:18 -0500 Received: from hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com (Not Verified[216.228.121.13]) by hqnvemgate25.nvidia.com (using TLS: TLSv1.2, DES-CBC3-SHA) id ; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 15:03:07 -0800 Received: from hqmail.nvidia.com ([172.20.161.6]) by hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com (PGP Universal service); Mon, 09 Dec 2019 15:03:13 -0800 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com on Mon, 09 Dec 2019 15:03:13 -0800 Received: from DRHQMAIL107.nvidia.com (10.27.9.16) by HQMAIL105.nvidia.com (172.20.187.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 23:03:13 +0000 Received: from [10.2.174.71] (10.124.1.5) by DRHQMAIL107.nvidia.com (10.27.9.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 23:03:11 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/15] soc: tegra: Add Tegra PMC clock registrations into PMC driver From: Sowjanya Komatineni To: Dmitry Osipenko , , , , , , , , CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , References: <1575600535-26877-1-git-send-email-skomatineni@nvidia.com> <1575600535-26877-4-git-send-email-skomatineni@nvidia.com> <7cf4ff77-2f33-4ee5-0e09-5aa6aef3e8be@gmail.com> <288a1701-def6-d628-26bc-a305f817bdb1@gmail.com> <78644d45-2ae3-121f-99fc-0a46f205907d@nvidia.com> Message-ID: <49da77dc-b346-68eb-9ef8-42cfb3221489@nvidia.com> Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2019 15:03:10 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP: [10.124.1.5] X-ClientProxiedBy: HQMAIL105.nvidia.com (172.20.187.12) To DRHQMAIL107.nvidia.com (10.27.9.16) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: en-US DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nvidia.com; s=n1; t=1575932588; bh=RD/UuYFLXtwBxgHk80kzPJPqxUQ1zAc8jBfi48zHg7Y=; h=X-PGP-Universal:Subject:From:To:CC:References:Message-ID:Date: User-Agent:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:X-Originating-IP: X-ClientProxiedBy:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Language; b=AF+ZrVUhuuI4n2G07/qPG+bFuep43+eiGM4ll6OZKtOX7H9bG1ZBL6W1Y+0W0aIEb KOqfHAt9utQisUiWPXchiaiRf0/+hVFVhOdpZ7TEicYJDa72O/5HGWJLSZHKhE/302 1VDHk6r585XJ6/xRAmujBL7OldwSDkMLqh7O5sFMxOPaf5H9bCIjTrbpM1b5ZQ7ZlW fmOuV43ULlc2wjdH1uOk+j864vcHbBAJGgbfa4p6BXgpxy61xeUseg67hVGMiZ/e2w iFBT03GD7G+fs9/i3BrSP86QSVFkZihdGSB0eACQVGHdVcAaYfNpgb4Sj58eNj9iHt 7sW63WDhQtmEQ== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/9/19 12:46 PM, Sowjanya Komatineni wrote: > > On 12/9/19 12:12 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >> 08.12.2019 00:36, Sowjanya Komatineni =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: >>> On 12/7/19 11:59 AM, Sowjanya Komatineni wrote: >>>> On 12/7/19 8:00 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >>>>> 07.12.2019 18:53, Dmitry Osipenko =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: >>>>>> 07.12.2019 18:47, Dmitry Osipenko =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: >>>>>>> 07.12.2019 17:28, Dmitry Osipenko =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: >>>>>>>> 06.12.2019 05:48, Sowjanya Komatineni =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1= =82: >>>>>>>>> Tegra210 and prior Tegra PMC has clk_out_1, clk_out_2, clk_out_3 >>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>> mux and gate for each of these clocks. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Currently these PMC clocks are registered by Tegra clock driver >>>>>>>>> using >>>>>>>>> clk_register_mux and clk_register_gate by passing PMC base=20 >>>>>>>>> address >>>>>>>>> and register offsets and PMC programming for these clocks happens >>>>>>>>> through direct PMC access by the clock driver. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> With this, when PMC is in secure mode any direct PMC access=20 >>>>>>>>> from the >>>>>>>>> non-secure world does not go through and these clocks will not be >>>>>>>>> functional. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This patch adds these clocks registration with PMC as a clock >>>>>>>>> provider >>>>>>>>> for these clocks. clk_ops callback implementations for these=20 >>>>>>>>> clocks >>>>>>>>> uses tegra_pmc_readl and tegra_pmc_writel which supports PMC >>>>>>>>> programming >>>>>>>>> in secure mode and non-secure mode. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sowjanya Komatineni >>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> [snip] >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> + >>>>>>>>> +static const struct clk_ops pmc_clk_gate_ops =3D { >>>>>>>>> +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 .is_enabled =3D pmc_clk_is_enabled, >>>>>>>>> +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 .enable =3D pmc_clk_enable, >>>>>>>>> +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 .disable =3D pmc_clk_disable, >>>>>>>>> +}; >>>>>>>> What's the benefit of separating GATE from the MUX? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I think it could be a single clock. >>>>>>> According to TRM: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1. GATE and MUX are separate entities. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2. GATE is the parent of MUX (see PMC's CLK_OUT paths diagram in=20 >>>>>>> TRM). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 3. PMC doesn't gate EXTPERIPH clock but could "force-enable" it, >>>>>>> correct? >>> Was following existing clk-tegra-pmc as I am not sure of reason for >>> having these clocks registered as separate mux and gate clocks. >>> >>> Yes, PMC clocks can be registered as single clock and can use clk_ops >>> for set/get parent and enable/disable. >>> >>> enable/disable of PMC clocks is for force-enable to force the clock to >>> run regardless of ACCEPT_REQ or INVERT_REQ. >>> >>>>>> 4. clk_m_div2/4 are internal PMC OSC dividers and thus these clocks >>>>>> should belong to PMC. >>>>> Also, it should be "osc" and not "clk_m". >>>> I followed the same parents as it were in existing clk-tegra-pmc=20 >>>> driver. >>>> >>>> Yeah they are wrong and they should be from osc and not clk_m. >>>> >>>> Will fix in next version. >>>> Reg clk_m_div2/3, they are dividers at OSC pad and not really internal=20 to PMC block. current clock driver creates clk_m_div clocks which should actually be=20 osc_div2/osc_div4 clocks with osc as parent. There are no clk_m_div2 and clk_m_div4 from clk_m Will fix this in next version. >> Could you please describe the full EXTPERIPH clock topology and how the >> pinmux configuration is related to it all? >> >> What is internal to the Tegra chip and what are the external outputs? >> >> Is it possible to bypass PMC on T30+ for the EXTPERIPH clocks? > > PMC CLK1/2/3 possible sources are OSC_DIV1, OSC_DIV2, OSC_DIV4,=20 > EXTPERIPH from CAR. > > OSC_DIV1/2/4 are with internal dividers at the OSC Pads > > EXTPERIPH is from CAR and it has reset and enable controls along with=20 > clock source selections to choose one of the PLLA_OUT0, CLK_S,=20 > PLLP_OUT0, CLK_M, PLLE_OUT0 > > So, PMC CLK1/2/4 possible parents are OSC_DIV1, OSC_DIV2, OSC_DIV4,=20 > EXTERN. > > > CLK1/2/3 also has Pinmux to route EXTPERIPH output on to these pins. > > > When EXTERN output clock is selected for these PMC clocks thru=20 > CLKx_SRC_SEL, output clock is from driver by EXTPERIPH from CAR via=20 > Pinmux logic or driven as per CLKx_SRC_SEL bypassing pinmux based on=20 > CLKx_ACCEPT_REQ bit. > > > PMC Clock control register has bit CLKx_ACCEPT_REQ > When CLKx_ACCEPT_REQ =3D 0, output clock driver is from by EXTPERIPH=20 > through the pinmux > When CLKx_ACCEPT_REQ =3D 1, output clock is based on CLKx_SRC_SEL bits=20 > (OSC_DIV1/2/4 and EXTPERIPH clock bypassing the pinmux) > > FORCE_EN bit in PMC CLock control register forces the clock to run=20 > regardless of this.