Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp4826762ybl; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 17:41:58 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxoiB8NuGbdGjTOZmVYcOIksXqK6Iy+h4YJP19cTbUE8TPdOcq/gNpqs5mMamCIVC7A8YML X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:218:: with SMTP id l24mr1994104oie.75.1575942117909; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 17:41:57 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1575942117; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=VW2A4jb0fz5wbIkCO3gcvkB4PsDPGNVcKB+G9DSUT00hKwCGZ5ASY+0flQi/Q1NOj8 Jkr+bokfF6g48cU4rRdSHMRAG8Ri3HaxPYrtztr/mISKAOusWHvAL5kH+gDnXcoY5VfO ALh7heZmT2GRDTMyQ4+7OC6v8v9zCHVrrReDG1l9zeYGimLet54F2Za07cczMtZFiKFK jwDE4p8o4LZANBrxvNNI110JekS6kSRwif3Nk2zTY/JCXtrsZ9FmX02F58Cf7DFnBxa5 T9532+uFTG8+aK1JXkAZYQmgDuEkiFsE7zYCVMm2nf49eTiffaKXNdooIE/fde9mrUMX cZJw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:organization:from:subject:cc:to :dkim-signature; bh=oyUzKzdeM0sxcJ7Rn8NSTTlnn7CO7NRM2Vib/efPBPs=; b=Ho/HWkJrQIyUyYAUUNF0A4OZYYgEqd8QvKBjYYJ4aDhP4+dCE+rXyO6l2b/eEl4ROB c8KbJ8BxA+kxmdgex7K9pX9jul3C90RIsdlUIY71JHXOST1qtW6b86qR6hjaHHqU9I4K KB2Y44M9KrwqDjt6G2qir0E1FrHWmOQBG/QJV0e5+I+0YWj8EdQjFvrKfHGi2qJQCXpr 0k8tpVLDsZJsefGUuN6VAT1TYiHeV79XwYerRg9bNowDx1YiRo5klt1rtnHpxZ7swf/M sR0Y385Ea39I/CFU8GYBY9uE/gd2KuMW2EH8OfoqoedpyipA2zEROWAzkN6vLHFyJDoV gZyQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@oracle.com header.s=corp-2019-08-05 header.b=h12ow5T7; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=oracle.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u16si1088637otq.92.2019.12.09.17.41.46; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 17:41:57 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@oracle.com header.s=corp-2019-08-05 header.b=h12ow5T7; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=oracle.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726824AbfLJBkT (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 9 Dec 2019 20:40:19 -0500 Received: from userp2130.oracle.com ([156.151.31.86]:38626 "EHLO userp2130.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726538AbfLJBkT (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Dec 2019 20:40:19 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (userp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id xBA1YOVS103590; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 01:39:55 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=to : cc : subject : from : references : date : in-reply-to : message-id : mime-version : content-type; s=corp-2019-08-05; bh=oyUzKzdeM0sxcJ7Rn8NSTTlnn7CO7NRM2Vib/efPBPs=; b=h12ow5T7teHpqRI6Npdj7UzbVXmJKU77i1ypMi9Q13tfEXzCbqI/8nxxi6U+KvUVY7tg 5u974DQR736kYxbORtmpntRzpITG2VW8T/xIATmTkLpECXRahq8fsSqlj6NDa9GNnL+z QOcm4B4pBSCTDN4QRl3JSzDcdj1LZPRgJuthK/7FF38rAaPzY2D4x/mzkpEirmOuVL7Z Ik+fMuiUOkm8A5SfjeL50aQctQmBliPGjCUEq3AjC5pDRwI4SpjB7GVtM29M65dLrAl9 suwIc07TDWl91LASdYvApd275xT6bt1yJgwmosLvJUPIh/pmn0jLRAEAxuPd0TQgG/7Y rA== Received: from userp3030.oracle.com (userp3030.oracle.com [156.151.31.80]) by userp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2wrw4myy6r-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 10 Dec 2019 01:39:55 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (userp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp3030.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id xBA1cvni170721; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 01:39:55 GMT Received: from userv0121.oracle.com (userv0121.oracle.com [156.151.31.72]) by userp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2wsv8awr0m-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 10 Dec 2019 01:39:55 +0000 Received: from abhmp0016.oracle.com (abhmp0016.oracle.com [141.146.116.22]) by userv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id xBA1dqKd019213; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 01:39:52 GMT Received: from ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com (/10.159.214.123) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 17:39:51 -0800 To: Lee Duncan Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" , "wubo \(T\)" , "cleech\@redhat.com" , "jejb\@linux.ibm.com" , "open-iscsi\@googlegroups.com" , "linux-scsi\@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" , Ulrich Windl , Mingfangsen , "liuzhiqiang \(I\)" Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] scsi: avoid potential deadlock in iscsi_if_rx func From: "Martin K. Petersen" Organization: Oracle Corporation References: Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2019 20:39:49 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Lee Duncan's message of "Tue, 10 Dec 2019 00:40:59 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9466 signatures=668685 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=797 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1911140001 definitions=main-1912100013 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9466 signatures=668685 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=860 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1911140001 definitions=main-1912100013 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Lee, > My sincere apologies. I told wubo I had already reviewed the patch, so > he didn't need another Reviewed-by from me. I see I was wrong. OK. The patch was all mangled so I had to apply the changes by hand. Can't say that I'm a big fan of retries going negative but I guess that's just personal taste. Applied to 5.5/scsi-fixes. Thanks! -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering