Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 11:16:10 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Michael Loftis <mloftis@wgops.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
Message-ID: <20060120191609.GA7530@kroah.com>
References: <D1A7010C56BB90C4FA73E6DD@dhcp-2-206.wgops.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <D1A7010C56BB90C4FA73E6DD@dhcp-2-206.wgops.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 892
Lines: 20

On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 08:17:40AM -0700, Michael Loftis wrote:
> 
> Normally I wouldn't care, and I'd just stay away from 'stable' until 
> someone finally figured out that a dev tree really is needed, but I can't 
> stay quiet anymore.  2.6.x is anything but stable right now.  It might be 
> stable in the sense that most any development kernel is stable in that it 
> runs without crashing, but it's not at all stable in the sense that 
> everything is changing as if it were an odd numbered dev tree.

Please detail your specific problems that you are having.  General rants
don't help anyone except make you feel better :)

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/