Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 10 Dec 2019 08:46:43 +0000
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To:     Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@gmail.com>
Cc:     Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Grigoryev Denis <grigoryev@fastwel.ru>,
        Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-leds@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] dt-bindings: mfd: update TI tps6105x chip bindings
Message-ID: <20191210084643.GP3468@dell>
References: <20191121142726.22856-1-TheSven73@gmail.com>
 <20191121142726.22856-3-TheSven73@gmail.com>
 <20191209123206.GI3468@dell>
 <CAGngYiX4hgEM7cjeLE-sRswDXTff92OqdBWNgx5WGNmPjuqsUA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20191210084603.GO3468@dell>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20191210084603.GO3468@dell>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 10 Dec 2019, Lee Jones wrote:

> On Mon, 09 Dec 2019, Sven Van Asbroeck wrote:
> 
> > Hi Lee, thank you for the review.
> > 
> > On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 7:32 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Tree: next-20191118
> > >
> > > Why is this in your commit message?
> > 
> > I have been posting patches against various maintainer trees lately, which
> > will not apply to mainline or next. So I have been including base tree
> > information in the patch itself.
> > 
> > Base-tree info on patches is high on developers' wish list, but not yet
> > standardized. This was discussed at the 2019 kernel maintainers
> > summit:
> > https://lwn.net/Articles/803619/
> 
> NB: I haven't seen this discussion (or opened this link just yet).
> 
> It's no problem to have it in the submission, but it would be better
> to have it *below* the '--' with the diff, such that if it is applied,
> it doesn't end up in the kernel's Git history.

Obviously that was meant to be '---'.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog