Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 10 Dec 2019 15:48:46 +0530
From:   Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc:     Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>,
        Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
        Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
        Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/core: Preempt current task in favour of bound
 kthread
Reply-To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
References: <20191118092121.GV4131@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20191118204054.GV4614@dread.disaster.area>
 <20191120191636.GI4097@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20191120220313.GC18056@pauld.bos.csb>
 <20191121132937.GW4114@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20191209165122.GA27229@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20191209231743.GA19256@dread.disaster.area>
 <20191210054330.GF27253@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20191210092601.GK2844@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20191210093338.GF2871@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20191210093338.GF2871@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Message-Id: <20191210101846.GC9139@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> [2019-12-10 10:33:38]:

> On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 10:26:01AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> > > @@ -6716,7 +6737,7 @@ static void check_preempt_wakeup(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wake_
> > >  	find_matching_se(&se, &pse);
> > >  	update_curr(cfs_rq_of(se));
> > >  	BUG_ON(!pse);
> > > -	if (wakeup_preempt_entity(se, pse) == 1) {
> > > +	if (wakeup_preempt_entity(se, pse) == 1 || kthread_wakeup_preempt(rq, p, wake_flags)) {
> > >  		/*
> > >  		 * Bias pick_next to pick the sched entity that is
> > >  		 * triggering this preemption.
> > 
> > How about something like:
> > 
> 	if (wakeup_preempt_entity(se, pse) >= !(wake_flags & WF_KTHREAD))
>
> That's a slightly less convoluted expression for the same value :-)	

Yes, this should work, let me try and get back to you.

-- 
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju