Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp5622511ybl; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 08:54:01 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxkb9Ki3ccwkyNi+tIK8p7nDeEnNP6P2uu+gohrkqAGyzRtDMuQc41MYSqYWquWK2R3PV81 X-Received: by 2002:aca:da06:: with SMTP id r6mr4670061oig.82.1575996841157; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 08:54:01 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1575996841; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=IHL0AqphClqEkssFhXs+RI3h9BL6vhWKRlebCQeBbsxghhFCq4MrnNnpnoD4o+uI+y j7HJC/z+GZTZCN6jgQ7sFpDJqWQHcnkg/0tY2GSrZPithlPao/SMCqEJ2sMgdhMQHQJ8 VcfvSxyftR2S0If50I1KHdSg+J57CwgWOFP2Pwf40Ree/aGZHHpj5Of75muCg+iadctH Vq4ylieMbq2Zz//64Lxmrt++6sMvVPOKVIj9/KCq1zJWRpSMqiia6T6aJ5G8whWIFqXR DYlYDcFTTSrUt6xcD4GLelWJ8hGCS7DWyvbpECziL6wbJOqouqkj+meURJTHvOthKzhl RvWQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=XseuT9KNW4ZxOPhheU6aLHXqHNxPOQpeF4SRLcEtqMA=; b=B64eH9e7CXTXLCTysRXqm6FqobO9XvHHAwmXsTjsKrRB9f2X66tGjOv53D5hHFpUNE ybEeJbNmJEHEqFMDOxRa82ExLHreNbZI2aFigD9iw38Wgx0GTuZQwMW0+AEzJLCTxXEE s3capFOnUa0ONQmFDjB58SKVteAvZqTC0AKKI/TT1ZNUkoRFljR3qQZoFO90rymVF03T 5dZQYewRyq2SwOdIbkvicwibUUHG9nXDkwjSC4E4RfLdwohPMa+ssnmChiyhBtW2NB42 hwyoJF7napQ1G/eooe3TfEibqJwfjYuGxEXx66UU8m2A4mxjUMrRW8ybQwIHQisKpvaf CeEQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g2si2011416otn.117.2019.12.10.08.53.48; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 08:54:01 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727634AbfLJQw4 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 10 Dec 2019 11:52:56 -0500 Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com ([185.176.76.210]:2176 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727572AbfLJQw4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Dec 2019 11:52:56 -0500 Received: from lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 7DC06A37E7AD78E2535D; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 16:52:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lhreml724-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.75) by lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 16:52:53 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.202.226.46) by lhreml724-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.75) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 16:52:53 +0000 Subject: Re: perf top for arm64? To: Jiri Olsa CC: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , , , , , , , , , Linuxarm , "linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org" References: <1573045254-39833-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> <20191106140036.GA6259@kernel.org> <418023e7-a50d-cb6f-989f-2e6d114ce5d8@huawei.com> <20191210163655.GG14123@krava> From: John Garry Message-ID: <952dc484-2739-ee65-f41c-f0198850ab10@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 16:52:52 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191210163655.GG14123@krava> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.202.226.46] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml728-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.79) To lhreml724-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.75) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/12/2019 16:36, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 04:13:49PM +0000, John Garry wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I find to my surprise that "perf top" does not work for arm64: >> >> root@ubuntu:/home/john/linux# tools/perf/perf top >> Couldn't read the cpuid for this machine: No such file or directory > Hi Jirka, > there was recent change that check on cpuid and quits: > 608127f73779 perf top: Initialize perf_env->cpuid, needed by the per arch annotation init routine > ok, this is new code. I obviously didn't check the git history... But, apart from this, there are many other places where get_cpuid() is called. I wonder what else we're missing out on, and whether we should still add it. Thanks, John > Arnaldo, > maybe this should be just a warning/info, because it seems to be related > to annotations only..? > > get_cpuid is defined only for s390/x86/powerpc, so I guess it won't work > on the rest as well > > jirka > >> >> That's v5.5-rc1 release. >> >> It seems that we are just missing an arm64 version of get_cpuid() - with the >> patch below, I now get as hoped: >> >> PerfTop: 32857 irqs/sec kernel:85.0% exact: 0.0% lost: 0/0 drop: 0/0 >> [4000Hz cycles], (all, 64 CPUs) >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> 8.99% [kernel] [k] arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist >> 5.80% [kernel] [k] __softirqentry_text_start >> 4.49% [kernel] [k] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore >> 3.48% [kernel] [k] el0_svc_common.constprop.2 >> 3.37% [kernel] [k] _raw_write_lock_irqsave >> 3.28% [kernel] [k] __local_bh_enable_ip >> 3.05% [kernel] [k] __blk_complete_request >> 2.07% [kernel] [k] queued_spin_lock_slowpath >> 1.93% [vdso] [.] 0x0000000000000484 >> >> >> Was this just missed? Or is there a good reason to omit? >> >> Thanks, >> John >> >> --->8--- >> >> Subject: [PATCH] perf: Add perf top support for arm64 >> >> Copied from get_cpuid_str() essentially... >> >> Signed-off-by: John Garry >> >> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/header.c >> b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/header.c >> index a32e4b72a98f..ecd1f86e29cc 100644 >> --- a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/header.c >> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/header.c >> @@ -1,10 +1,12 @@ >> #include >> #include >> #include >> +#include >> #include >> #include >> #include "debug.h" >> #include "header.h" >> +#include >> >> #define MIDR "/regs/identification/midr_el1" >> #define MIDR_SIZE 19 >> @@ -12,6 +14,59 @@ >> #define MIDR_VARIANT_SHIFT 20 >> #define MIDR_VARIANT_MASK (0xf << MIDR_VARIANT_SHIFT) >> >> +int >> +get_cpuid(char *buffer, size_t sz) >> +{ >> + char *buf = NULL; >> + char path[PATH_MAX]; >> + const char *sysfs = sysfs__mountpoint(); >> + int cpu; >> + u64 midr = 0; >> + FILE *file; >> + >> + if (!sysfs) >> + return EINVAL; >> + >> + buf = malloc(MIDR_SIZE); >> + if (!buf) >> + return EINVAL; >> + >> + /* read midr from list of cpus mapped to this pmu */ >> + for (cpu = 0; cpu < cpu__max_present_cpu(); cpu++) { >> + scnprintf(path, sz, "%s/devices/system/cpu/cpu%d"MIDR, >> + sysfs, cpu); >> + >> + file = fopen(path, "r"); >> + if (!file) { >> + pr_debug("fopen failed for file %s\n", path); >> + continue; >> + } >> + >> + if (!fgets(buf, MIDR_SIZE, file)) { >> + fclose(file); >> + continue; >> + } >> + fclose(file); >> + >> + /* Ignore/clear Variant[23:20] and >> + * Revision[3:0] of MIDR >> + */ >> + midr = strtoul(buf, NULL, 16); >> + midr &= (~(MIDR_VARIANT_MASK | MIDR_REVISION_MASK)); >> + scnprintf(buffer, MIDR_SIZE, "0x%016lx", midr); >> + /* got midr break loop */ >> + break; >> + } >> + >> + if (!midr) { >> + pr_err("failed to get cpuid string\n"); >> + free(buf); >> + return EINVAL; >> + } >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> > > . >