Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751194AbWAUJGg (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jan 2006 04:06:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751197AbWAUJGg (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jan 2006 04:06:36 -0500 Received: from linux01.gwdg.de ([134.76.13.21]:47765 "EHLO linux01.gwdg.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751194AbWAUJGf (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jan 2006 04:06:35 -0500 Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 10:06:19 +0100 (MET) From: Jan Engelhardt To: Lee Revell cc: Alistair John Strachan , "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric?= L. W. Meunier" <2@pervalidus.net>, Adrian Bunk , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, perrye@linuxmail.org Subject: Re: RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach In-Reply-To: <1137803431.3241.24.camel@mindpipe> Message-ID: References: <20060119174600.GT19398@stusta.de> <1137703548.32195.25.camel@mindpipe> <200601192203.11032.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk> <1137803431.3241.24.camel@mindpipe> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 698 Lines: 20 >> Fear of not getting it included? > >I doubt anyone so thin skinned would make it as far as being able to >write a working Linux driver ;-) > >Anyway, what's to fear? The worst that will happen is that the kernel >maintainers will request some changes. "We are the Linux developers. Lower your license and surrender your code. We will add your code to our kernel. Your code will be adapted to CodingStyle. Resistance is futile." Jan Engelhardt -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/