Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp6022079ybl; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 15:39:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzvX7Ka5ny8r0YEqvDab+CGaXWg01qQ+vMFBP1biGDspIDdjy1c9DrpFujoVOw0Wyjlb2Ey X-Received: by 2002:aca:2b1a:: with SMTP id i26mr544043oik.64.1576021173132; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 15:39:33 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1576021173; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Zakju4J+ER/QxczjN2R5FpsvC1fSJMXvvATe4AZ1dpxolA7LVBhlXkxd9arZzBnb5n TSd5ijaedwZy4RtSh84IWRBa+uFRM5UezpkFYx6LSfMFusxOnucBM3A3QP4yScbuTrll e0jK1CPviuM0JdPEmio+Xxf3UAkLasK5sgCOlnCaK25BPAwm3kD6ETMNCvrizmRF5DAT SXQkUFPQIa6/N4mNKqu/Ri6YLR/L9SZGSaNERMoAe2rYVTdWIyD/eAfAerNZeBP55wGr FrrxmUSHKb45SAnntheJxmYW+TBuKAOzDmYY9J5mxKcfbdXlZ63iS7O32KMEddH5awri NV4Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=PN+H46fqLvJ3jOINwaYxQ0kWKagyUvn7R0kB4R3LZ0c=; b=UkIsKEmVQJSTCBwJj6tdjTPbsHU+M+KNZdsksP54s+GpdnktsiS5SR9m4t9OMhcOF2 T5OXoRYc9LvzYai/3wZbrcxZwScrYfoLbXCSkBCPFJUkC+oTMFwBEN8dUQymqvx7WY6/ rsNH5a3RkTaRhAZzq6dATl0+o68lR5nChRJeOA9Ne7cwh7u2e0VEuY8aQEre/FfpE1vp dKkTfau0Z0nAMDgLl0vhVLa178t+Tcc60rRZzuAcii4I8bKV7/K/YBCWK4HBGcb9DEDw o6UZk48Rp51zrR1hrloda7Y6HKa4EZGL1hJ/b9nozpKhzP4zN4SesKfdxZxiTM2Av2JW LTQg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i2si2690402otc.130.2019.12.10.15.39.21; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 15:39:33 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726598AbfLJXho (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 10 Dec 2019 18:37:44 -0500 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.43]:28187 "EHLO mga05.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726062AbfLJXho (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Dec 2019 18:37:44 -0500 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga008.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.58]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Dec 2019 15:37:43 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,301,1571727600"; d="scan'208";a="210586609" Received: from sjchrist-coffee.jf.intel.com (HELO linux.intel.com) ([10.54.74.202]) by fmsmga008.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Dec 2019 15:37:43 -0800 Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 15:37:42 -0800 From: Sean Christopherson To: Wei Wang Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, kan.liang@intel.com, mingo@redhat.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com, like.xu@intel.com, jannh@google.com, arei.gonglei@huawei.com, jmattson@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 12/14] KVM/x86/lbr: lbr emulation Message-ID: <20191210233742.GB23765@linux.intel.com> References: <1565075774-26671-1-git-send-email-wei.w.wang@intel.com> <1565075774-26671-13-git-send-email-wei.w.wang@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1565075774-26671-13-git-send-email-wei.w.wang@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 03:16:12PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote: > +static bool intel_pmu_set_lbr_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > + struct msr_data *msr_info) > +{ > + struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu); > + u32 index = msr_info->index; > + u64 data = msr_info->data; > + bool ret = false; > + > + /* The lbr event should have been allocated when reaching here. */ > + if (WARN_ON(!pmu->lbr_event)) > + return ret; > + > + /* > + * Host perf could reclaim the lbr feature via ipi calls, and this can > + * be detected via lbr_event->oncpu being set to -1. To ensure the > + * writes to the lbr msrs don't happen after the lbr feature has been > + * reclaimed by the host, the interrupt is disabled before performing > + * the writes. > + */ > + local_irq_disable(); > + if (pmu->lbr_event->oncpu == -1) > + goto out; > + > + switch (index) { > + case MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR: > + ret = true; > + /* > + * Currently, only FREEZE_LBRS_ON_PMI and DEBUGCTLMSR_LBR are > + * supported. > + */ > + data &= (DEBUGCTLMSR_FREEZE_LBRS_ON_PMI | DEBUGCTLMSR_LBR); > + vmcs_write64(GUEST_IA32_DEBUGCTL, data); > + break; > + default: > + if (is_lbr_msr(vcpu, index)) { > + ret = true; > + wrmsrl(index, data); @data needs to be run through is_noncanonical_address() when writing the MSRs that take an address. In general, it looks like there's a lack of checking on the validity of @data. > + } > + } > + > +out: > + local_irq_enable(); > + return ret; > +} > +