Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
        alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] perf/x86/intel/bts: Small fixes
In-Reply-To: <20191210174047.GQ2844@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20191205142853.28894-1-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> <20191210174047.GQ2844@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Wed, 11 Dec 2019 13:33:17 +0200
Message-ID: <87eexbcd1e.fsf@ashishki-desk.ger.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> writes:

> On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 05:28:51PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
>> Hi Peter and Ingo,
>> 
>> Here are two small fixes that resulted from running perf_fuzzer on a !KPTI
>> kernel. One is a misguided and unannotated warning and another is a sketchy
>> use of page_private(). The choice between deleting the BTS driver and
>> fixing it is not obvious, though. It may theoretically still have users.
>> 
>> Alexander Shishkin (2):
>>   perf/x86/intel/bts: Remove a silly warning
>>   perf/x86/intel/bts: Fix the use of page_private()
>
> I'll squash the pair, that makes more sense to me.

Thanks!