Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 11 Dec 2019 14:08:57 +0100
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To:     Toke =?iso-8859-1?Q?H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen?= <toke@redhat.com>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        bpf@vger.kernel.org, Martin Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v2] bpftool: Don't crash on missing jited insns or
 ksyms
Message-ID: <20191211130857.GB23383@linux.fritz.box>
References: <20191210181412.151226-1-toke@redhat.com>
 <20191210125457.13f7821a@cakuba.netronome.com>
 <87eexbhopo.fsf@toke.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <87eexbhopo.fsf@toke.dk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 10:09:55PM +0100, Toke H?iland-J?rgensen wrote:
[...]
> Anyhow, I don't suppose it'll hurt to have the Fixes: tag(s) in there;
> does Patchwork pick these up (or can you guys do that when you apply
> this?), or should I resend?

Fixes tags should /always/ be present if possible, since they help to provide
more context even if the buggy commit was in bpf-next, for example.