Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp642518ybl; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 05:21:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxa2bI/6g1jhgstPHeAEe1MjZImUvXk5+dSQnpndyIUvboBQrga5RbVTpiV22MVOol74LGp X-Received: by 2002:a9d:eea:: with SMTP id 97mr2081549otj.177.1576070492911; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 05:21:32 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1576070492; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=sI0WBB0D1U1k90hx3D2AyVKt4EBgSF67DEPrzl7iK+D0D03B7dtDPXLeNjgL6BnkFR Gp03mHkomjaK9r1d6h7s+YpPHuC8NyYlvQfKYFU6KlKoogESeQRiVV/PfDcmfPiwtcIT NGa/9xyKzX0zviluhNjgiovkZOaTe1pAMuPnSpaCKzKIryByG+KJDMcXejXS3wk0SgBD S3skjikxj4jcykYysuf0lanNRnEpbLEJqpV8/cHnzOr6szghtM5o90kCibeFWcU0HR2O PzmSA2fZjvlE/e1vStSSiHCM3JXkzvExdRtOHV1rtWLZ/wTbzSkeRAcmNG+z7iTjB9bT N8SA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=o/u/4ZEqQP0e+uS2+lCszxa5LZBpaQoPz1LVNN7voyg=; b=VCOgHUuPzk6z6uAOagVfM19B/WOGC2yj3bJ9cj5YCZakViNhM2JL8o9U8QNbmJoqY7 qjW30O+8/reB8THX/O8IGwpJQZZp8Bh6xiBjiiUF02CiNh+FRO8AbqTD5Yj7cNrF0s0I KxobJWXFab391Lu/DqbZEV3mjWsJUzjBr/wNRI0Q5UjjAiirB5adhykc+J4HXOQNkF/k xAxa/JFeuLap8iclaEhKbCB1fkqRhsMUWdFxWkgTcqLgFXDG9vbgFl8ihJ0LT5b04j4R oOUD1mYsMRuZ0Z5PNYjDZD2LbbAMD+eoF4YrRq2HKq42GZkn0AOhnLPdkGDY/MmlPavn /ReQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=dE92+E8K; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i205si1126653oih.257.2019.12.11.05.21.21; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 05:21:32 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=dE92+E8K; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729565AbfLKNUV (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 11 Dec 2019 08:20:21 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.81]:52963 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728128AbfLKNUU (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Dec 2019 08:20:20 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1576070419; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=o/u/4ZEqQP0e+uS2+lCszxa5LZBpaQoPz1LVNN7voyg=; b=dE92+E8Keo6YqSkUKbQr++CMuiQIjplKbMtXwxLR0fWUD8bB7y+amC3EK6XdBZG3b2yX/K lp0cS0lQKTzj4978xYr3d/J15PIhdqDY8iDFyGL5vD2ZYDQDEFAgKHOIPeHZCagY9KIbYS SX6HWPIMMFf0vzb0yKQw2XPkUbdr/UM= Received: from mail-lf1-f70.google.com (mail-lf1-f70.google.com [209.85.167.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-141-drEHkx9cNC2qmQrIYoLj9A-1; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 08:20:15 -0500 Received: by mail-lf1-f70.google.com with SMTP id t8so2103303lfc.21 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 05:20:15 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=o/u/4ZEqQP0e+uS2+lCszxa5LZBpaQoPz1LVNN7voyg=; b=ZV+Mt98F3X/m7eXxwSm7vSbDcownO0Hr3Ced9hl+LT69z87V/TmX7ZyNq/6u2fq4WM xF204BdrefoZ91MJ13t1ZoMnA6JUl5LNsiVC+mV4lAz8I5yVYljOHFjgNQoO7XYrQNuZ +1FszZBNZuJbAzbsCktX4yGikwna0/+CfsgyKrx05DoMS27K0MqFsQkO8EYoepejlgdt me1UrAL8JRr4gcgjwDCR0wizrTXvJj+eYWKN4uHo7EnStozCma7Z96t5j3O+8DkX/YTz cP5wUC2ngb7xr4Z6WeCyxbdvzw5DFXGlJa7R/tqDxyawLxeTmI4DbtJgE/zwVHPAPFR7 2Wrw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUxB62havg1GRoC44tzfVU1jH5zuaYfvyoj60zZbeA5iECFUPan q/wFfBQvzkEGpD1E9Rvm3KLMEVPEfjAsXyCREvvu8CHCcGAMoXmH8oEsWgEpe7gBffr4GZ3zRwm 3Iy1Mk71cm+3c/1c1jGYMTKi5 X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9b95:: with SMTP id z21mr1806008lji.112.1576070414501; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 05:20:14 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9b95:: with SMTP id z21mr1805990lji.112.1576070414253; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 05:20:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from alrua-x1.borgediget.toke.dk ([2a0c:4d80:42:443::2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c12sm1157656lfp.58.2019.12.11.05.20.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 11 Dec 2019 05:20:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by alrua-x1.borgediget.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 64AA318033F; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 14:20:11 +0100 (CET) From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: Daniel Borkmann Cc: Jakub Kicinski , Alexei Starovoitov , lkml , netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, Martin Lau Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v2] bpftool: Don't crash on missing jited insns or ksyms In-Reply-To: <20191211130857.GB23383@linux.fritz.box> References: <20191210181412.151226-1-toke@redhat.com> <20191210125457.13f7821a@cakuba.netronome.com> <87eexbhopo.fsf@toke.dk> <20191211130857.GB23383@linux.fritz.box> X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 14:20:11 +0100 Message-ID: <87zhfzf184.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MC-Unique: drEHkx9cNC2qmQrIYoLj9A-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Daniel Borkmann writes: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 10:09:55PM +0100, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgense= n wrote: > [...] >> Anyhow, I don't suppose it'll hurt to have the Fixes: tag(s) in there; >> does Patchwork pick these up (or can you guys do that when you apply >> this?), or should I resend? > > Fixes tags should /always/ be present if possible, since they help to pro= vide > more context even if the buggy commit was in bpf-next, for example. ACK, will do. Thank you for picking them up for this patch (did you do that manually, or is this part of your scripts?) -Toke