Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 14 Oct 2001 12:36:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 14 Oct 2001 12:36:24 -0400 Received: from minus.inr.ac.ru ([193.233.7.97]:11783 "HELO ms2.inr.ac.ru") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 14 Oct 2001 12:36:08 -0400 From: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru Message-Id: <200110141636.UAA05762@ms2.inr.ac.ru> Subject: Re: TCP acking too fast To: ak@muc.de (Andi Kleen) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 20:36:15 +0400 (MSK DST) Cc: davem@redhat.com, ak@muc.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20011014133004.34133@colin.muc.de> from "Andi Kleen" at Oct 14, 1 01:30:04 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello! > I just checked and the 2.4 kernel doesn't have the PSH quickack check > anymore, Right, it is removed because all the PSHed packets are acked as soon as rcvbuf is completely drained and window is full open. See? It is the reason of "too frequent" ACKs and I daresay they are not too frequent and it is impossible to do something with this. These ACKs are an _absolute_ demand and delay by some small time helps nothing destroying performance instead. Well, it is the place, commented with "Dubious? ... final cut." It is enough to delete it to avoid "too frequent" ACKs and to return to too rare ACKs instead. Alexey - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/