Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932317AbWAUVVk (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:21:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932356AbWAUVVk (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:21:40 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:34454 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932317AbWAUVVj (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:21:39 -0500 Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 13:17:18 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Dave Jones Cc: arjan@infradead.org, bunk@stusta.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pbadari@us.ibm.com, kenneth.w.chen@intel.com Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the obsolete raw driver Message-Id: <20060121131718.1b6bbcdc.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060121194102.GB28051@redhat.com> References: <20060119030251.GG19398@stusta.de> <20060118194103.5c569040.akpm@osdl.org> <1137833547.2978.7.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20060121194102.GB28051@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1471 Lines: 34 Dave Jones wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 09:52:27AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 19:41 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > > > > > Let's do the scheduled removal of the obsolete raw driver in 2.6.17. > > > > > > > > > > heh. I was just thinking that I hadn't heard from Badari and Ken in a while. > > > > > > I doubt if this'll fly. We're stuck with it. > > > > One thing we can do is ask the distributions to stop shipping raw first, > > to see what the fallout is (and to give it as a sign that it's an > > obsolete interface). Then a year or two after that.... > > It's been off in Fedora since FC4. > RHEL4 had it enabled after several vendors complained a lot about its > absense breaking an installed userbase, though they were told it would be > enabled with the proviso that it would go away in the future. > RHEL5 isn't even in beta yet, but I can already hear the voices asking > for it be reenabled.. > Thanks for trying though ;) It's good that RH is helping to push things along like this - the easiest path would be to turn the thing on and complain when anyone made noises about taking it out. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/