Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 109/243] sparc: Correct ctx->saw_frame_pointer logic.
Date:   Wed, 11 Dec 2019 16:04:31 +0100
Message-Id: <20191211150346.490033245@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20191211150339.185439726@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20191211150339.185439726@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.66
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

[ Upstream commit e2ac579a7a18bcd9e8cf14cf42eac0b8a2ba6c4b ]

We need to initialize the frame pointer register not just if it is
seen as a source operand, but also if it is seen as the destination
operand of a store or an atomic instruction (which effectively is a
source operand).

This is exercised by test_verifier's "non-invalid fp arithmetic"

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp_64.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp_64.c b/arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp_64.c
index 7217d63596431..ec4da4dc98f12 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp_64.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp_64.c
@@ -1270,6 +1270,9 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
 		const u8 tmp2 = bpf2sparc[TMP_REG_2];
 		u32 opcode = 0, rs2;
 
+		if (insn->dst_reg == BPF_REG_FP)
+			ctx->saw_frame_pointer = true;
+
 		ctx->tmp_2_used = true;
 		emit_loadimm(imm, tmp2, ctx);
 
@@ -1308,6 +1311,9 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
 		const u8 tmp = bpf2sparc[TMP_REG_1];
 		u32 opcode = 0, rs2;
 
+		if (insn->dst_reg == BPF_REG_FP)
+			ctx->saw_frame_pointer = true;
+
 		switch (BPF_SIZE(code)) {
 		case BPF_W:
 			opcode = ST32;
@@ -1340,6 +1346,9 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
 		const u8 tmp2 = bpf2sparc[TMP_REG_2];
 		const u8 tmp3 = bpf2sparc[TMP_REG_3];
 
+		if (insn->dst_reg == BPF_REG_FP)
+			ctx->saw_frame_pointer = true;
+
 		ctx->tmp_1_used = true;
 		ctx->tmp_2_used = true;
 		ctx->tmp_3_used = true;
@@ -1360,6 +1369,9 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
 		const u8 tmp2 = bpf2sparc[TMP_REG_2];
 		const u8 tmp3 = bpf2sparc[TMP_REG_3];
 
+		if (insn->dst_reg == BPF_REG_FP)
+			ctx->saw_frame_pointer = true;
+
 		ctx->tmp_1_used = true;
 		ctx->tmp_2_used = true;
 		ctx->tmp_3_used = true;
-- 
2.20.1