Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp792578ybl; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 07:35:23 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyllUjBo8yrgcm7lJGOygr2dvYs6xaLed2Ovkd/IDHnNy8Yw2jLfBx1lPAH3XExNmu5giQI X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6396:: with SMTP id w22mr2772876otk.364.1576078522792; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 07:35:22 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1576078522; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=jYGjoLruoIHZVsN/c8um0oV5jBw1A4xR4fNlRZSnr6HrHpDt5u2PUOSarMnnykMVjU I6rJhPlHvzJ0WBbHXo2BW14F+CsBsuuDHVvu3ZrNWdmJs9JXbRXd0eTrkiCVvEIPB7py R0Ko29piYketNv/SsGPrM/IEDE5acGZiBJ2yn5ql9lsJOomRkFX8c16dSqWlyYGiTyDc DNhhy4eugtkmKYR1jEXCEoGEvAj660k7/iksXSXd1Yve2u0ok1P4kd5t5uFZS+SAuTey fzZM3ExetA4BW7c3cCFBEyJIrVQFWrJ4bPUaMdQKpcoq8t+DsRaf/YzvVZOAzwPFA1h3 fDCg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:date:from :dkim-signature; bh=eI29NPHgR+JJigbHSfSxbr0+0qNwPqbPN+NH3i1Irec=; b=pIdWkokxltJe9aK8JPVnXqQo99GxcHM9zgfuu/sVCWxJBSQT98BRRIAeJphJei5QPW f8LqCrjQQ5xKTDoOpZY7KqJ5OaShE+tBv8nn+RXGbwquSB8QAhFAiW6ql7NTOx5pUSQq ZkxU90Jy95d2yeGyyDEsyHNeRPOfGa1JV1HG7iVUs7tOz2fWJmskw8lI9sAw+IRkLIQZ mXrwLgo+G+gelfpGc6333kRg2c5D7bnkJ8eNq8DNngCCmw3dKW79KAK5pBT6ZnwIfBQp wIGINNxGVbKXtbY4VR+hw04B2u1tWmrRFhwu3Y6PKLwFL40/S4kgNzkYQjRbMCCCo0Lo 7NYg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=YYT3x922; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m24si1271091otn.67.2019.12.11.07.35.10; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 07:35:22 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=YYT3x922; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387719AbfLKPei (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 11 Dec 2019 10:34:38 -0500 Received: from mail-vs1-f67.google.com ([209.85.217.67]:45774 "EHLO mail-vs1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1733039AbfLKP2N (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Dec 2019 10:28:13 -0500 Received: by mail-vs1-f67.google.com with SMTP id l24so16015120vsr.12; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 07:28:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=eI29NPHgR+JJigbHSfSxbr0+0qNwPqbPN+NH3i1Irec=; b=YYT3x922MQWm+f4a0aKynxOZDe3KgmaaUs1IKwJxWA5OaHODRf0PX8aGLcJMUDdnDc /zzwfy6q0SZxyoiCwFJ9K+W/j6OQpEUbDt0hLQ6NdAR3IEiW7GpS4XU+D/phGMfIM3aW mUKZ2Oc9FQsStkX7VFf1NTH3UsfhaKNHQQYQwVTJg5LCtNO6eDZt3pCxEYyeT4ZeKids SQCpARlV+mWTaiGw6kXTxSUuWxqGqYY2gzEnCsg/Pn2/qv38da8TgyrEFMrFjPzMcqAe peI5pKQQbpVfqrJjbHyPi4s3qM9Jb3mAbHr0LwJ71vMfm8X5sRG+sb4NN+o3Bu+BQ+zW U3SA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=eI29NPHgR+JJigbHSfSxbr0+0qNwPqbPN+NH3i1Irec=; b=g8abiMnyz5Box+lKy/ITa7tEUvowW8XcBwxAyzZC/Ov/Z5/TRBBQl6hZYu2sWIvaZZ BxaJbq9MzS2RtTqYg8oZK0tKxYD7eU26iUMayCbGoAFEAKhq3dZ5Wg9X8S/+DFVbVEA9 yNmYBSV58mn9k7mUdoYpkmZaQOzCUmGY0UaPxjbEMIa8iiGtpy7LefShMi3GsVf0H6mK 0qduTG8uEIbs2grI+4h6Gnc/D2Q2eTMs6vshz5+jB1riX2+ha9QkOkJtFkiSGRkQXrE8 hLF8KVP2GwvHKc8qFO2fwR4ET6kiuqLrHKYonFlsQR4lHlyn8G8UNuxCp0KKJNITfPK+ 0OAA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXduZQOeRJ0pdIMHWKjjaO5QqFYSI3GfzFqXImqo/7ZY8JRvzpp CH7iODmUIyEfKdK1FdBn94w= X-Received: by 2002:a67:b03:: with SMTP id 3mr3063976vsl.72.1576078087457; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 07:28:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from quaco.ghostprotocols.net ([179.97.35.50]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 9sm1679121vkr.39.2019.12.11.07.28.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 11 Dec 2019 07:28:06 -0800 (PST) From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo X-Google-Original-From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Received: by quaco.ghostprotocols.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8E6D640352; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 12:28:04 -0300 (-03) Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 12:28:04 -0300 To: Mark Rutland Cc: John Garry , Jiri Olsa , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Alexander Shishkin , Namhyung Kim , will@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Linuxarm , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Fix 'perf top' breakage on architectures not providing get_cpuid() Re: perf top for arm64? Message-ID: <20191211152804.GD15181@kernel.org> References: <1573045254-39833-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> <20191106140036.GA6259@kernel.org> <418023e7-a50d-cb6f-989f-2e6d114ce5d8@huawei.com> <20191210163655.GG14123@krava> <952dc484-2739-ee65-f41c-f0198850ab10@huawei.com> <20191210170841.GA23357@krava> <9a31536b-f266-e305-1107-2f745d0a33e3@huawei.com> <20191210195113.GD13965@kernel.org> <20191211133319.GA15181@kernel.org> <20191211144643.GC35097@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191211144643.GC35097@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 02:46:43PM +0000, Mark Rutland escreveu: > On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 10:33:19AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > So can you take a look at the two patches below and provide me Acked-by > > and/or Reviewed-by and/or Tested-by? > > I just gave this a spin. With vanilla v5.5-rc1 perf top behaves as John > reported, and with these applied atop perf works as expected: > > Tested-by: Mark Rutland > > >From scaning the code, the only other user of get_cpuid() that ends up > giving up is perf kvm, but AFAICT that never supported arm64, so that > looks sound to me: > > Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland Thanks guys, added all the tags, appreciated, I also added this: Fixes: 608127f73779 ("perf top: Initialize perf_env->cpuid, needed by the per arch annotation init routine") Thanks Jiri for pointing to it. - Arnaldo > Thanks, > Mark. > > > From 53c6cde6a71a1a9283763bd2e938b229b50c2cd5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > > Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 10:09:24 -0300 > > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] perf arch: Make the default get_cpuid() return compatible > > error > > > > Some of the functions calling get_cpuid() propagate back the error it > > returns, and all are using errno (positive) values, make the weak > > default get_cpuid() function return ENOSYS to be consistent and to allow > > checking if this is an arch not providing this function or if a provided > > one is having trouble getting the cpuid, to decide if the warning should > > be provided to the user or just a debug message should be emitted. > > > > Cc: Adrian Hunter > > Cc: Jiri Olsa > > Cc: John Garry > > Cc: Mark Rutland > > Cc: Namhyung Kim > > Cc: Will Deacon > > Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-lxwjr0cd2eggzx04a780ffrv@git.kernel.org > > Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > > --- > > tools/perf/util/header.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/header.c b/tools/perf/util/header.c > > index becc2d109423..4d39a75551a0 100644 > > --- a/tools/perf/util/header.c > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/header.c > > @@ -850,7 +850,7 @@ int __weak strcmp_cpuid_str(const char *mapcpuid, const char *cpuid) > > */ > > int __weak get_cpuid(char *buffer __maybe_unused, size_t sz __maybe_unused) > > { > > - return -1; > > + return ENOSYS; /* Not implemented */ > > } > > > > static int write_cpuid(struct feat_fd *ff, > > -- > > 2.21.0 > > > > From c6c6a3e2eb6982e37294abcac389effd298cf730 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > > Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 10:21:59 -0300 > > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] perf top: Do not bail out when perf_env__read_cpuid() > > returns ENOSYS > > > > 'perf top' stopped working on hw architectures that do not provide a > > get_cpuid() implementation and thus fallback to the weak get_cpuid() > > default function. > > > > This is done because at annotation time we may need it in the arch > > specific annotation init routine, but that is only being used by arches > > that do provide a get_cpuid() implementation: > > > > $ find tools/ -name "*.[ch]" | xargs grep 'evlist->env' > > tools/perf/builtin-top.c: top.evlist->env = &perf_env; > > tools/perf/util/evsel.c: return evsel->evlist->env; > > tools/perf/util/s390-cpumsf.c: sf->machine_type = s390_cpumsf_get_type(session->evlist->env->cpuid); > > tools/perf/util/header.c: session->evlist->env = &header->env; > > tools/perf/util/sample-raw.c: const char *arch_pf = perf_env__arch(evlist->env); > > $ > > > > $ find tools/perf/arch -name "*.[ch]" | xargs grep -w get_cpuid > > tools/perf/arch/x86/util/auxtrace.c: ret = get_cpuid(buffer, sizeof(buffer)); > > tools/perf/arch/x86/util/header.c:get_cpuid(char *buffer, size_t sz) > > tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/header.c:get_cpuid(char *buffer, size_t sz) > > tools/perf/arch/s390/util/header.c: * Implementation of get_cpuid(). > > tools/perf/arch/s390/util/header.c:int get_cpuid(char *buffer, size_t sz) > > tools/perf/arch/s390/util/header.c: if (buf && get_cpuid(buf, 128)) > > $ > > > > For 'report' or 'script', i.e. tools working on perf.data files, that is > > setup while reading the header, its just top that needs to explicitely > > read it at tool start. > > > > Reported-by: John Garry > > Analysed-by: Jiri Olsa > > Cc: Adrian Hunter > > Cc: Mark Rutland > > Cc: Namhyung Kim > > Cc: Will Deacon > > Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-lxwjr0cd2eggzx04a780ffrv@git.kernel.org > > Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > > --- > > tools/perf/builtin-top.c | 10 +++++++--- > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-top.c b/tools/perf/builtin-top.c > > index dc80044bc46f..795e353de095 100644 > > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-top.c > > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-top.c > > @@ -1568,9 +1568,13 @@ int cmd_top(int argc, const char **argv) > > */ > > status = perf_env__read_cpuid(&perf_env); > > if (status) { > > - pr_err("Couldn't read the cpuid for this machine: %s\n", > > - str_error_r(errno, errbuf, sizeof(errbuf))); > > - goto out_delete_evlist; > > + /* > > + * Some arches do not provide a get_cpuid(), so just use pr_debug, otherwise > > + * warn the user explicitely. > > + */ > > + eprintf(status == ENOSYS ? 1 : 0, verbose, > > + "Couldn't read the cpuid for this machine: %s\n", > > + str_error_r(errno, errbuf, sizeof(errbuf))); > > } > > top.evlist->env = &perf_env; > > > > -- > > 2.21.0 > > -- - Arnaldo