Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751264AbWAVIde (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Jan 2006 03:33:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751265AbWAVIde (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Jan 2006 03:33:34 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:4228 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751264AbWAVIdd (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Jan 2006 03:33:33 -0500 Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 00:33:07 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Russell King Cc: anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ralf@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: serial_txx9 driver update Message-Id: <20060122003307.738931b7.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060122080015.GA10398@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20060118.021901.71085469.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <20060121233649.51211403.akpm@osdl.org> <20060122080015.GA10398@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1391 Lines: 34 Russell King wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 11:36:49PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Atsushi Nemoto wrote: > > > > > > serial_txx9_verify_port(struct uart_port *port, struct serial_struct *ser) > > > { > > > - if (ser->irq < 0 || > > > - ser->baud_base < 9600 || ser->type != PORT_TXX9) > > > + unsigned long new_port = (unsigned long)ser->port + > > > + ((unsigned long)ser->port_high << ((sizeof(long) - sizeof(int)) * 8)); > > > > Are you sure about this part? Shifting something left by sizeof(something) > > seems very strange. It'll give different results on 64-bit machines for > > the same hardware. Are you sure it wasn't supposed to be an addition? > > There is a definition for that constant - it's called HIGH_BITS_OFFSET. There are two definitions, actually. drivers/serial/serial_core.c and drivers/serial/8250.h. > No need to try to buggily recreate it. Where's the bug in the proposed code? Can you tell us what HIGH_BITS_OFFSET actually does? Stuffing the port address into the upper 32-bits of a ulong on 64-bit machines. Am consumed by curiosity. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/