Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 11 Dec 2019 19:12:22 +0200
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To:     Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc:     James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
        "Zhao, Shirley" <shirley.zhao@intel.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        "linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
        "keyrings@vger.kernel.org" <keyrings@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        'Mauro Carvalho Chehab' <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>,
        "Zhu, Bing" <bing.zhu@intel.com>,
        "Chen, Luhai" <luhai.chen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: One question about trusted key of keyring in Linux kernel.
Message-ID: <20191211171222.GA4516@linux.intel.com>
References: <A888B25CD99C1141B7C254171A953E8E4909BA3B@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <1575260220.4080.17.camel@linux.ibm.com>
 <A888B25CD99C1141B7C254171A953E8E4909D360@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <1575267453.4080.26.camel@linux.ibm.com>
 <A888B25CD99C1141B7C254171A953E8E4909E381@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <1575269075.4080.31.camel@linux.ibm.com>
 <A888B25CD99C1141B7C254171A953E8E4909E399@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <1575312932.24227.13.camel@linux.ibm.com>
 <20191209194715.GD19243@linux.intel.com>
 <1575926334.4557.17.camel@linux.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <1575926334.4557.17.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 04:18:54PM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-12-09 at 21:47 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 10:55:32AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > blob but it looks like we need to fix the API.  I suppose the good news
> > > is given this failure that we have the opportunity to rewrite the API
> > > since no-one else can have used it for anything because of this.  The
> > 
> > I did successfully run this test when I wrote it 5 years ago:
> > 
> > https://github.com/jsakkine-intel/tpm2-scripts/blob/master/keyctl-smoke.sh
> 
> Thanks, Jarkko. ?Is this test still working or is there a regression?

I will run it and in addition to that I will make a patch out of it.

Any suggestions for the script name (should probably have 'tpm2' in
it at least)?

/Jarkko